Miami Special Utility Authority (MSUA)

📅 Jan 21, 2025 | Clip #589

⚠️ DISCREPANCIES

⚠️ Discrepancies & Missing Documents (2)

⚠️ No Official Minutes Published

The city has not published official minutes for this meeting. Under Oklahoma Open Meeting Act (25 O.S. § 308), minutes of all public meetings must be kept and made available.

🟡 City Has Not Published Minutes

Our transcript is complete but the city has not published official minutes on AgendaCenter. This may indicate a delay or failure to comply with open records requirements.

📹 Meeting Video

Open official source

📝 AI Transcript

[00:00] We'll have the invocation on. Part T, the Chris General would definitely follow a thankful for you and we're

[00:07] grateful to this community in The Blessing It is For so many ways as that

[00:12] You leave them meeting tonight That discussion with Matt has honest interspecial or productive

[00:17] And give our council members list when they make decisions where their

[00:20] community that affects us all in your name we pray.

[00:26] We met them, and pledge allegiance to the flag of

[00:29] The United States of America

[00:32] And it's just a republic for which is saying one nation under God

[00:35] Invisible with liberty and justice for our

[00:43] For Public Info and I'm getting personal parents

[00:47] Five Plains List

[00:49] Most true proof

[00:53] Second

[00:55] Second

[01:07] Second

[01:11] 17

[01:15] Second

[01:22] Second

[01:24] Second

[01:35] of $945.

[01:39] I guess we're giving this a big set,

[01:41] 9 or $4000 that's always been if

[01:45] This is approved in the

[01:48] In our $140860 as you all are cheap for

[02:01] We can do something.

[02:05] Thanks.

[02:07] Thanks.

[02:09] Hi.

[02:11] No discussion on solid waste management

[02:13] Alternatives evaluation

[02:15] Percentive by Burns and McDonald

[02:18] Julie Davis.

[02:20] Hi.

[02:22] I'm happy to be here,

[02:26] Okay?

[02:28] All right so more of us are the ones in

[02:35] Act oral 15 years and you're

[02:38] Biominal engineering team

[02:40] So we focus on solid waste form or

[02:43] Environmental system

[02:45] First Molyer with this region

[02:46] We're going to focus on the public and

[02:49] On the public.

[02:51] On the public,

[02:53] But we recently wrapped up a study

[02:55] To follow results from this looking at

[02:57] Opportunities for future facility

[02:59] Employment whether it's

[03:01] Persuasion or landfill.

[03:17] Maybe turn off

[03:28] Sorry.

[03:30] I think you have a good three party

[03:32] So do a quick overview of the

[03:34] Participant in your project or

[03:35] You're going to have a new

[03:38] Transversation Serial Analysis

[03:41] New landfills.

[03:43] We did two different versions of that

[03:45] And then I present our key findings and recommendations for

[03:49] Access so your current transportation

[03:52] You take it at about 20,000 tons per year

[03:55] From the city

[03:57] The City's residential and commercial

[04:01] Customers

[04:03] Additional resident through

[04:05] The facilities are used for 30 years

[04:08] And you need significant improvement to continue operations

[04:12] So the facility also was on a former

[04:14] Incentorator site so it wasn't

[04:17] Originally designed

[04:19] To be a Transversation Facility

[04:21] This contracts with only in fill

[04:23] 70 miles away from

[04:25] The actual disposal so that's

[04:27] Public and Lamar

[04:29] We saved the combined of

[04:31] Transportation

[04:33] That is contractive with a private

[04:37] Haller for Transportation

[04:39] And the city's in

[04:41] Increases and cost

[04:43] Significantly through those transportation costs

[04:45] As well as disposal costs

[04:47] So that very common

[04:49] As we see capacity and landfills going down

[04:51] In an region

[04:53] The Cost per time had to get

[04:56] With increased and the

[04:59] Transversation costs

[05:02] We've worked for a number of local governments across

[05:06] And on hundreds the cities

[05:08] So we created that plan

[05:10] Facility and Alicies

[05:12] To look at what could be options to make

[05:14] Infurзance to your existing facility

[05:16] In New Transportation

[05:19] For development of landfills

[05:22] One would

[05:24] Minimum tonnage scenario

[05:26] As this city

[05:28] More than a year

[05:31] We've worked for the city

[05:34] And we have to work

[05:37] To make sure that the City

[05:39] Plus what could be expected from some of

[05:41] The other

[05:45] Transversations within their region

[05:47] Then it maximums tonnage scenario

[05:50] So if you were

[05:52] If your really market

[05:56] That material or

[05:57] The conditions again for the new transportation

[06:00] It was based on this community

[06:02] We'll work with that

[06:04] And then landfills scenarios

[06:06] Both of their region

[06:09] Taking in consideration some

[06:13] Regional facilities that are existing

[06:16] So within the area

[06:18] But there's not a lot

[06:21] Projective population

[06:23] Or has it been recently

[06:25] Like you have seen increases in your tonnage still

[06:29] And so to be conservative we wanted

[06:31] To maintain that estimated increase year over a

[06:34] Year

[06:36] That You've occurred

[06:39] In the last few years for Your Tonnage

[06:44] So, We use it as a

[06:46] Your gate fees

[06:49] So how much It costs for folks

[06:52] For The region

[06:54] New Transversation that rate could go up

[06:57] And Could push waste other places to cheaper facilities

[07:01] So just To note, That

[07:03] It should be something

[07:05] Can't guarantee the tonnage until you look at what it costs on within

[07:08] The region

[07:10] In transportation and disposal cost would still

[07:12] With a third party

[07:14] And potentially will increase over time

[07:17] And focus capacity decreases with in Norwegian

[07:19] So looking at transportation design and cost assumptions

[07:24] Looked a capacity of 25,700

[07:27] Ten years so a slight increase over time

[07:30] Point 4 7%

[07:32] I didn't interest rate

[07:34] Of 3.5 percent

[07:36] Amortized Over 20 Years

[07:38] A Putments on a lower five year

[07:40] Immortalization

[07:42] Looking At 5A for Properties

[07:44] To use Property that the city party has a

[07:46] Transversation On

[07:47] That site, 10.000 square foot building

[07:51] And Put a contingency on that

[07:53] Which is consistency for our cost

[07:55] Consistent For Our Cost Estimates

[07:58] We didn't include revenues

[08:00] So Didn'n Include the you are

[08:02] Bringing in Charging your

[08:04] Residents or people bringing it outside waste as part of this assessment

[08:10] You're looking Around

[08:12] 7 million dollars in capital costs

[08:14] Developing a new transportation facility

[08:19] We're looking at the purchase

[08:22] A Putment for Transversation

[08:25] This is a new equipment

[08:29] Because we are not familiar with how old and open you have on site currently

[08:32] But it used to be, you know

[08:34] Refurches every few years

[08:36] And then regular operations in maintenance cost

[08:39] We looked Over that 20 year time frame

[08:41] It comes out To Be 93 dollars

[08:44] 27 Doll

[08:45] 27 cents per time

[08:49] If you were to Develop a new transportation

[08:51] To replace the existing facility

[08:54] Again, there may be opportunities

[08:56] To reduce that up front capital

[08:58] Or use any of The equipment

[09:00] That You already have on site

[09:02] But

[09:06] So we looked at within A 30 mile radius around

[09:10] This city

[09:12] There are 7 transfer stations including yours

[09:15] Look to some of those transfer stations that

[09:19] Currently Hall a significant distance similar

[09:22] To you all, You call 70 miles

[09:24] What benefit would Those

[09:26] Transversations have?

[09:28] Bringing waste into A new landfill here within this area

[09:31] Rather than going

[09:33] Some other facilities

[09:35] We looked at ownership of the facility and assets

[09:37] For example if

[09:39] Transportation is owned by private waste entity

[09:41] They would likely take their waste to Their

[09:44] Landfill even though it's further away

[09:46] Because they can do that at a lower cost

[09:48] Versus there were A number of transfer stations

[09:50] That we're city owned

[09:52] Or by private entities

[09:54] Don't have landfills, It will be more likely To be

[09:56] Divided into a landfill here

[09:58] Look the historical tonnage data

[10:00] And projections based on The population growth

[10:03] Of the eight county region

[10:05] There is a larger waste shed

[10:06] That can be considered for a landfill

[10:09] We did minimum and maximum cap

[10:12] A couple slides just trying to Be conservative on

[10:15] What those tonnages could look like

[10:18] This analysis that we've provided now

[10:21] The cities would take full capital cost

[10:24] Ownership in operation of this new landfill facility

[10:28] There are some options

[10:30] For alternatives with

[10:31] That the minimum and maximum scenario tonnage scenarios

[10:38] The minimum was based on assuming that

[10:44] 20% to 50 percent of

[10:47] Of waste could be directed from other transfer stations

[10:50] We're owned by cities

[10:52] To this area

[10:54] And then, none

[10:56] Outof a waste would Be deverted

[10:58] From any of their private land transfer stations

[10:59] The maximum tonnage is assumed 100% of the waste

[11:03] That would be currently generated at those

[11:06] Transversations owned by cities

[11:08] Would come to this new landfill

[11:10] As well as some Of their private ways

[11:13] To that, This may Be a closer proximity for them

[11:16] So thats why we ran two different scenarios

[11:19] Just try and show projections again

[11:21] If city decided

[11:23] To move forward

[11:24] That could look like long term

[11:26] But that gave us a facility footprint

[11:29] Aker of 250 to 300 acres

[11:31] Which is conservative

[11:33] Thats not all area

[11:35] It would be developed into an actual landfill

[11:38] The landpilth footprint

[11:41] Is much less closer

[11:44] 30 acre

[11:46] You need lot Of areas for borrow soil, space

[11:48] Storm water ponds, leachate pons

[11:50] Hall roads

[11:51] There's a lot of other

[11:54] Ancillary features that are on landfills

[11:57] That require that acre

[12:01] Similar design and cost assumptions

[12:04] 3.5% interest rate over 20 years

[12:07] Equipment at 5 Years

[12:09] Assumed a costs for acre based on

[12:11] Recent Land Value sales in Ottawa County

[12:14] Again, no actual property

[12:17] Or location was used For this study

[12:19] So it is really just looking at

[12:20] Land available of this size

[12:23] Within proximity

[12:25] We assume sell development every five years

[12:28] So when you develop a landfill

[12:30] You initially developed your scale house, buildings

[12:33] Your ponds and initial cell

[12:35] And then every 5 Years

[12:37] Develop another area

[12:39] Or open in new areas

[12:41] Close the old areas

[12:43] So developing a new salary five

[12:45] Similar contingency

[12:46] And then significant increase in staffing and equipment

[12:50] To account for this

[12:52] Increased on your operation

[12:54] Again, it's included no revenue

[12:56] So now outside

[12:59] Revenue generated by that gate tipping fee

[13:02] You would be able to set whatever rate you wanted

[13:05] That the charge 2 outside

[13:08] Hullers bring an invoice

[13:14] Total here for the minimum landfill alternative

[13:17] It is about 11.9 million

[13:18] But over 20 years

[13:21] It costs for time

[13:23] Is 69.75 cents

[13:27] Not including that new landfill capital

[13:29] A New sell development

[13:31] Equipment, again

[13:33] New equipment all being purchased

[13:35] And then increased operations and maintenance

[13:39] Then before the larger capacity

[13:41] Laying fell facility

[13:43] For a large or 10-inch

[13:45] Total of about

[13:46] $1.9 million

[13:49] And that comes out to be

[13:51] 49 dollars and 94 cents for a ton

[13:54] So as you can see

[13:56] It's much more cost effective

[13:58] To have the landfill when we had

[14:00] A lot larger waste share or capacity of that landfo

[14:06] In summary, your current system

[14:10] Your annual throughput

[14:12] 19000 tons per year

[14:14] As I've 2023

[14:16] The costs are about

[14:17] $1.4 million

[14:19] And then the amount of

[14:23] The amount is about

[14:25] $2,000 and 45 cents

[14:28] Looking at a new transportation

[14:30] Increasing

[14:32] To project out some growth

[14:34] Within

[14:36] In the next 20 years

[14:42] You can get

[14:46] The minimum permitting

[14:48] Design and construction timeline of a new

[14:50] Transpursation is 3 to 5 years

[14:52] Well the minimum equivalent for

[14:54] A landfill has five-to seven

[14:56] Years

[14:59] I've been permitting

[15:01] Design, constructing landfills

[15:03] For 15 year's both here in O'Homach

[15:05] Kansas, Missouri

[15:07] DQ

[15:09] Good job

[15:11] But there are times

[15:12] We have a lot of money

[15:16] And we are planning and

[15:18] And the planning

[15:21] And that facility

[15:23] So it's

[15:26] A long-term process

[15:29] Transpursation is much shorter

[15:31] Just based on potential impacts in

[15:33] The size

[15:35] Of property, its

[15:38] Much different permitting

[15:40] Process

[15:42] It's a very valuable

[15:46] Conducting

[15:48] Improving

[15:50] Revealable properties to determine

[15:52] Cost impacts and setting

[15:54] To determine regulatory

[15:56] And environmental feasibility

[15:59] The landfill has cost

[16:01] But it is all determined on viability of having

[16:03] A property that makes sense

[16:05] Having land, accessible

[16:07] An off-and size

[16:09] In nature

[16:11] The property is a lot of

[16:16] A lot of properties

[16:19] The properties, water, zoning

[16:22] Other properties

[16:24] Flood plans

[16:26] Wetlands

[16:28] All those are considerations

[16:30] As well as some operational things

[16:32] Is it close to

[16:34] Highway or other residences

[16:38] So that would be one

[16:40] Continuous conversations we have talked to different

[16:43] Transpursations on what their thoughts

[16:45] Bringing waste this direction

[16:47] To a new landfill

[16:49] But continue that

[16:51] To get firm commitments

[16:54] To better size for facility

[16:57] And local farm out you can project

[16:59] That way is generation

[17:01] Typically when we cycle in

[17:04] Films, we are looking at silking them

[17:06] For 50-80 or 100 years of capacity

[17:07] And we are looking at the

[17:12] And landfill gate fees and landfill

[17:15] The gas is going to go up for everyone

[17:19] It's also good

[17:21] To look right now your transportation

[17:23] I looked very briefly

[17:25] Is competitively price with others

[17:27] But as you

[17:29] Making investments that

[17:32] And then consider partnerships to support the development of a new

[17:35] Transpursation or landfill

[17:37] To share an upfront capital cost and provide

[17:40] Costability long-term

[17:42] So we work with all our local government clients that may partner

[17:45] With other entities

[17:48] That could be partnering

[17:51] Local communities, tribal agency

[17:54] With private waste company

[17:56] And we are looking at the

[17:59] Organic business

[18:01] We have a client that will pay to develop

[18:04] The facility and private waste company

[18:07] Operating on their behalf

[18:10] In turn, clients

[18:12] Long-term stable cost for waste management

[18:16] Moving forward

[18:18] We're not taking anything they may be familiar with in

[18:21] So there's a lot of opportunities for partnership

[18:24] The city could evaluate if you wanted to move forward with

[18:28] Developing more infrastructure

[18:33] Can we take any questions?

[18:50] You've done this

[18:52] Pretty familiar

[18:55] Have your work

[18:57] Both the transfer station scenario and landfill

[19:01] What are your personal preference

[19:04] I guess is most

[19:05] I guess the biggest bang for our buck

[19:09] Sure, so if there are a number of landfill facilities

[19:14] Or processing facility within

[19:16] The region and transfer stations allow municipalities in general to have

[19:19] A lot flexibility

[19:21] And their waste can go over time

[19:23] Which makes other people competitive

[19:25] In pricing

[19:27] So you had lots

[19:29] Of options, landslides

[19:32] You could get really competitive pricing

[19:34] In areas where there isn't a lot of other facilities

[19:39] Then landfill does allow for the city to take control

[19:43] Of their own costs that they will have

[19:46] And manage

[19:48] That cost through development

[19:50] If it's up facility and then

[19:53] There is opportunities

[19:56] To generate revenue

[19:58] I would say a lot

[20:00] Some of them operate landfill, some

[20:05] The mob rate transfer station and then have both

[20:08] Depending on how large they are

[20:11] How large the operation is

[20:13] One concerns that cities

[20:15] Have in transitioning from a transfer

[20:18] It's very significant

[20:20] If you want to move

[20:23] You're familiar with regulatory compliance

[20:25] But there sometimes benefits

[20:27] If you want to have a partner that can help with ramping up

[20:31] And even in the short term period

[20:34] Whether it's 5 or 10 year contract

[20:36] Or longer, after 30 years depending on what

[20:39] What your city and state statutes allow

[20:42] To support

[20:44] Support

[20:46] The operation of this facility

[20:49] As well as their comfort level is

[20:51] And diving into something that might be new

[20:55] Compared to what you do at the transfer station

[20:59] Earlier, are we touched on

[21:01] The subject of what materials

[21:04] You allow for your landfill

[21:07] Can it expand a little bit?

[21:10] Are there medical waste and things like this

[21:12] What was evaluated in municipal solid wastewater

[21:16] This would just feed household waste

[21:18] There could be an option

[21:19] Construction and demolishing waste could be included as well

[21:23] So that's for construction materials

[21:25] There are opportunities

[21:28] If you do have enough acreage, they would even co-locate

[21:31] Perhaps a composting facility

[21:33] A adjacent to it

[21:35] They might offer two newties for grant funding

[21:37] You wanted

[21:39] If we want into integrate something like a composting facility

[21:41] But primarily the landfill

[21:43] We evaluated with municipal solid wastewater

[21:45] That is an permit

[21:46] That would be valid for facility like this

[21:51] So I have to look at that our transfer station

[21:54] Would you say whatever way we go

[21:56] We need a big grant of

[21:58] Yes, so i personally again

[22:00] Have not been into your transportation

[22:02] Because im tagging in

[22:04] For someone but

[22:06] But Im seen quite few photos

[22:08] And work with a number

[22:10] Of transport stations on improvement

[22:11] Regardless you have some work to do

[22:14] And quickly would be beneficial

[22:18] So again my opinion correct me if i'm wrong

[22:21] I think Kevin, feel free jump in

[22:23] As well

[22:25] After like we all did

[22:27] We need a big aggressive on the land

[22:30] Otherwise

[22:32] If when going through transfer station

[22:34] We're gonna

[22:36] Have a crash problem there

[22:38] And i think we can solve a long-term problem for our community

[22:42] By being aggressive and going to land fill around

[22:46] It may be more expensive at the beginning

[22:48] But I like that

[22:50] We save money in end

[22:54] If you were too moved forward with sighting of landfill

[22:57] it would prevent others from doing so

[23:00] Likely in their region

[23:02] So this city could kind

[23:04] Of taking natural

[23:05] Maybe private entities or others

[23:08] That are looking in this region to develop facilities

[23:12] To the city if they had a transfer station

[23:16] But would be out of your control

[23:18] How much money was teleported?

[23:22] I mean i didn't know that it just looked

[23:24] Hard on what to tell

[23:26] It sounds like...

[23:28] Except for one begins with the next

[23:31] And then you have to do it

[23:34] I just like the fact that we can control our destiny

[23:38] And when you need to

[23:40] But i think with transfer station

[23:43] We're always at someone else's mercy on their cost

[23:46] That costs of them a continue

[23:48] To go up it started going down

[23:50] For having all 70 miles

[23:54] Gas prices play into there

[23:56] They are fees

[23:58] At least hours

[24:00] Then they actually make some revenue

[24:03] Others more user-away

[24:06] Other transfer stations are also hauling just as far

[24:10] Or if not farther

[24:12] I do think that your location is a

[24:15] A prime locations for this

[24:18] There's some private entities

[24:20] That would be interested in partnerships

[24:22] They will allow them to pull from regions

[24:24] To get their landfill

[24:27] But they have something closer

[24:29] Either transportation or landfill

[24:31] Or you would be very interested in the city

[24:34] They control their destiny

[24:36] In terms of charging whatever they want

[24:38] You can negotiate different rates for

[24:41] Different parties so it could still

[24:43] Be this rate

[24:45] For your residents and

[24:47] For residential and commercial collection that

[24:49] The City does

[24:51] And then charge a higher rate

[24:53] Private waste is brought in

[24:55] We're going to go sheated rates

[24:56] So a lot of options and flexibility there over time

[25:02] I'm good. Thank you

[25:19] The grant is the

[25:21] Engineering Services appropriate to conduct

[25:24] Our substation three upgrades not exceed

[25:27] $48,740 content

[25:29] Clopsimission required

[25:31] This will be for

[25:36] Section the control

[26:50] We'll include in touch squirrel devices

[26:53] There's so lot here

[26:55] I'm going to be able

[26:57] To clear that

[26:59] These are the just what a great

[27:02] Other place it is

[27:07] It also includes commissioning

[27:13] That equipment after

[27:32] Thank you

[27:34] She knows, gonna ask

[27:39] Appreciate

[27:41] This like Eric said this

[27:44] This is just being

[27:46] The speed and things you come to the industrial park

[27:49] Design of

[27:52] New sub station

[27:56] I'm sorry

[27:58] To

[28:00] Or

[28:07] They can structure that it would be

[28:10] We've already seen

[28:19] Benefit

[28:21] Abgraded so

[28:22] I don't mean this is a no brainer to me

[28:25] Make it much my proof

[28:28] Thank you

[28:30] Thanks

[28:32] Hi

[28:34] We'll see

[28:37] You guys

[28:39] Keep on top of our infrastructure

[28:42] Now that's the focus

[28:45] Thank you

[28:46] Hello

[29:29] In general, I'm 17 of the regular week

[29:32] The month is again

📄 Full Agenda

NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING AND AGENDA
OF THE MIAMI SPECIAL UTILITY AUTHORITY (MSUA)
Tuesday, January 21, 2025
5:30

p.m.
MIAMI CIVIC CENTER
129 5th Avenue Northwest, Miami, Oklahoma
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk and displayed in the main lobby of the Miami Civic Center and by
posting on www.miamiokla.net.
THE MSUA MAY DISCUSS, CONSIDER, AND VOTE ON ANY ITEM LISTED IN THIS AGENDA:
1.
Call to Order Chairman Parker
2.
Invocation by the Fire Chief of the Miami Fire Department Chris Chenoweth
3.
Pledge of Allegiance Trustee Estep
4.
Public Input and Unscheduled Personal Appearances
Each person will be limited to three minutes. The purpose of this agenda item is to provide an opportunity for citizens’ comments and public announcements. In keeping with the principals of the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act, Council [or commission, authority or board] members and city staff will not engage in discussion or take any action under this agenda item. If you seek discussion or further inquiry, please contact your Council Member, the Mayor or the office of the city manager. Responses to citizen comments, if any, will occur under an applicable Agenda item at this or a future public meeting, or a response may be given by a phone call, personal meeting or a posting on the city website:
www.miamiokla.net
5.
*Action Item* Claims Trustees
Claims List
Credit Cards
6.
*Action Item* Claim for Vance Ford Trustees
Claims List
7.
*Action Item* Minutes: January 07, 2025 (Regular) Trustees
Minutes
8.
*Action Item* Goodell, Stratton, Edmonds & Palmer Claim for Pensacola/GRDA Relicensing and Associated Complaint Proceeding in the Amount of $945.00 Tyler Cline/Misty Barnes
BA
Claims List
9.
Discussion of the Solid Waste Management Alternatives Evaluation, Presented by Burns & McDonnell Julie Davis/Tyler Cline
*Action Item* Agreement With SEL Engineering Services, Inc. to Conduct Substation 3 Upgrades Not to Exceed $248,740.00, Contingent Upon Submission of Required Contract Documents Derric Lollar
BA
Agreement
PPT
11.
*Potential Action Item* Other New Business, if any, Which has Arisen Since the Posting of the Agenda and Could not Have Been Anticipated Prior to the Time of Posting (25 O.S. § 311(9)) Trustees/Tyler Cline
12.
Staff Reports (Written report included in packet, if available staff is present for questions) Trustees
Pollution Control
Solid Waste
Storm Water
PCAX Collections and Miami Nation Credit Balance as of 12312024
13.
Trustee Community Announcements Trustees
14.
The Meeting Will be Continued From the Council Chambers and Reconvened in the Staff Room for Purposes of the Executive Session at the Completion of Agenda Item #17 of the Regular Meeting of the Miami City Council Chairman Parker
15.
Executive Session in the Staff Room to Review Previous Executive Session Minutes Trustees
16.
Executive Session in the Staff Room Pursuant to 25 O.S. §307(B)(4) for Purposes of Confidential Communications Between the Trust and its Attorney Concerning a Pending Investigation, Claim, or Action, to wit: City of Miami, et al., v. GRDA CJ-08-619 and F.E.R.C. Project No. 1494 Trustees
17.
Executive Session in the Staff Room Pursuant to 25 O.S. 307(C)(11) for Purposes of Conferring on Matters Pertaining to Economic Development, Financing, or the Creation of a Proposal to Entice a Business to Locate or Expand Within the City of Miami or the Trust Service Area Trustees
18.
Executive Session in the Staff Room Pursuant to 25 O.S. 307(B)(3) and (4) for Discussing Potential Economic Development Through Purchase of Real Property or Enhancement of Real Property to be Provided by the City and/or one of its Trust Authorities as Part of an Economic Development Project Trustees
19.
The Meeting Will be Reconvened in the Staff Room After the Executive Session Trustees
20.
*Possible Action Item* on Matters Addressed in Executive Session Agenda Item Number 16 Trustees
21.
*Possible Action Item* on Matters Addressed in Executive Session Agenda Item Number 17 Trustees
22.
*Possible Action Item* on Matters Addressed in Executive Session Agenda Item Number 18 Trustees
23.
*Action Item* Adjournment Trustees
The MSUA Board of Trustees for the City of Miami is committed to making this meeting accessible to all citizens. If special assistance or accommodations are required, please submit your request to the City Manager's office. We also ask that those in attendance place all electronic devices on silent. Thank you.