Mayor's Flood Advisory
⚠️ DISCREPANCIES
⚠️ Discrepancies & Missing Documents (3)
⚠️ No Official Agenda Document
The city has not published an agenda document for this meeting on AgendaCenter. This is a transparency concern - agendas should be publicly available before meetings.
⚠️ No Official Minutes Published
The city has not published official minutes for this meeting. Under Oklahoma Open Meeting Act (25 O.S. § 308), minutes of all public meetings must be kept and made available.
🟡 City Has Not Published Minutes
Our transcript is complete but the city has not published official minutes on AgendaCenter. This may indicate a delay or failure to comply with open records requirements.
📹 Meeting Video
📝 AI Transcript
[00:00] Order the marriage to let the public agree for Wednesdays in 12th and 12th, and let's get the
[00:07] care sisters. We have no time left. I'll do it. Let us read from the book, like I've
[00:11] said, James. As I said, the marriage to let the public agree to the schedule for the second
[00:18] of 530. I'm really glad to hear the meeting will be held in a larger venue and a lot of this.
[00:26] So I'm not willing to attend the meeting more public meetings in person. I believe the danger to
[00:31] the public is real and the city and the state will soon move back to the road to be more proactive
[00:38] for the event health. I hope I'll let you share what I expressed last week. I'm extremely pleased
[00:44] to say that this is actually flooded by a report knowing the impact flooding paths are community
[00:50] for so many decades. The flood is a dirty deal and the city has a current great loss each time,
[00:59] as well as individual citizens who experience floods in such personal ways. The memories
[01:05] lost air-nitched oil, traditional regalia room, property values, quantity, more citizens who could must
[01:13] be allowed as decisions of greater importance, maybe made rather quickly by this board.
[01:20] At the first board should include homeowners and representatives of those many who live in
[01:25] rentals. We all know we'll flood every time. The city is stronger when the needs of many are included
[01:33] in the plan for the future. Those needs must include places people live. The floods in the future will
[01:41] be more intense due to climate change and with real and with real possibilities like the
[01:46] local crisis approved is a promise 100 more residents will inflate it for the first time. The city cannot
[01:54] overlook that much of that water, plainness of the cold will be toxic. Loaded with the heavy metal
[02:01] for our heartbreak. The city and this board must look closely to the EPA for a permanent solution
[02:08] to the toxic loading, heartbreak carries and make every effort to stop that flow,
[02:13] put through down and ultimately into the sweat of the arts and public spaces all on this route.
[02:21] The city can demand EPA, heart, payment, and jury aid. Look at the big fix and have that coordinate
[02:28] their efforts for the real solution to the flooding in the island. Thank you for your time. I respectfully
[02:34] submit these comments and hope to hear back from the mayor. The members of this
[02:38] thought the mayor has left it by report. Number 3, presentation from Silverjackets regarding the
[03:11] I don't know how you can do it.
[03:13] As I've been seeing this presentation, all right?
[03:23] Sort of, I know, or socially distanced.
[03:27] So I'm kind of, I don't know how to make those.
[03:44] I can't get them up with Michael Moles.
[03:46] And I've worked with the album, according to the years,
[03:49] I've been tells the district.
[03:51] I've a geotechnical, uh, in a year,
[03:54] and I've been working with emergency management
[04:00] for the last two years.
[04:02] I'll be getting them with the course of 2019, uh,
[04:06] and I've heard a bunch of all the main waterways
[04:08] and you know, both on the outside,
[04:10] and the Oklahoma emergency operations center,
[04:14] working with the emergency operations.
[04:17] They're out of the state.
[04:18] And then, uh, getting this training with the COVID-avc,
[04:21] and 50 up build up.
[04:22] So that has started working with emergency management both on.
[04:25] Uh, one of the first projects that I saw when we were going,
[04:28] uh, when, when I focused my attention,
[04:31] specifically to, uh, emergency management,
[04:35] and, uh, core of the projects.
[04:37] And, uh, Silverjackies was, uh,
[04:40] the My Apple Project, because it,
[04:42] they, it floods frequently.
[04:44] Just like you said,
[04:45] it has heavy metals that, uh,
[04:46] uh, super fun scientists of the north of it,
[04:48] which are part of our pretty much through,
[04:50] and, uh, middle, middle,
[04:52] flood mitigation, uh,
[04:55] efforts.
[04:58] So, um,
[05:00] we came here, what was it a couple months ago?
[05:04] Uh, something like that.
[05:05] Um, we had, um,
[05:06] classic, well, we could call a sense in session,
[05:10] and, uh, just to kind of get ideas of what the city of Miami
[05:14] and the north of the valley,
[05:15] but I could do with some of the Silverjackies funding.
[05:18] And, uh, we came up with, uh,
[05:21] four different, um,
[05:24] project proposals, uh,
[05:27] that, uh, from feedback from you.
[05:31] Um, number one of them is a Belmont run.
[05:34] Which is, um,
[05:36] consistently, uh,
[05:37] uh, out of jail,
[05:38] that, as you know, um,
[05:39] and minimal, uh,
[05:41] channel, uh,
[05:42] equipment, uh, with that.
[05:44] Um,
[05:45] there is no, uh,
[05:47] there is no infrastructure,
[05:50] off of the Neo-Show River.
[05:51] Uh, that could be a potential project to,
[05:53] to make limit structures, uh,
[05:56] a lot of Neo-Show River,
[05:58] and then, uh,
[05:59] the big-
[06:00] This one, I think, is an ingress and egress rouse into and out of the city of Miami.
[06:07] When the water comes up, the tarpre comes up, and the new shirt comes up, and it
[06:12] effectively makes it a city of Miami, and I am, and so we put a little bit of effort on,
[06:19] focusing on centerline, road improvement, raising road profiles, improving ingress and egress
[06:27] rouse.
[06:28] That was a feedback coming out from you.
[06:33] So, one of the things that we can use with the silver jacket funding is start
[06:43] the process of feasibility study in Nesca, feasibility study with larger efforts, but then
[06:50] the city of Miami, Miami, and the global mitigation hazard mitigation team.
[06:58] I'm going to open this up to Bill and Matt and David.
[07:05] Hey, Bill.
[07:10] I'm going to go to the public office.
[07:16] I'm going to go to the public office.
[07:20] I'm going to go to the public office.
[07:22] I'm going to go to the public office.
[07:28] Right, David.
[07:36] Sure.
[07:37] So, I'm pillar of the honing organization's administration at the R&C,
[07:42] M-1 models is a footprint in A-certainment Services, and so part of what it is, so Jack it's
[07:50] and we came up with another one to talk about some of the things we Could do,
[07:54] it was part of this project we have funding for.
[07:59] I didn't find, first and foremost, the urgent issue concerning
[08:03] egress, I didn't even have a flood, either down, still is a little
[08:08] hard or another route out town.
[08:12] And so what kind of a one of you is refinement, FEMA, is already now, FEMA's
[08:18] provide a new mass, and we need to provide a little bit to take the
[08:23] account, the incident frequency between the large flood along the ocean,
[08:28] and then we'll need those to come in to our creek.
[08:30] So we can pin down, we'll be out, the frequency flows in the baseline
[08:35] elevation, based on those joint to out those joint flows are, so we can find
[08:41] a design level for what they've heard, they prefer egressory, which is,
[08:45] whether they're on a San C1, so we have the road to the north, the near
[08:50] me out.
[08:51] Also, I didn't find, specifically, this area, a long-tarpard footage in the north.
[09:00] I don't want to run that there's a issue of what keeps me
[09:04] flash flooding the town.
[09:06] And so I think we can do some study with that to
[09:10] provide some recommendations to you about
[09:14] some steps that we take into the minute at that point.
[09:18] And so those are probably the best
[09:24] bandwidth of our items we can do for the city.
[09:26] And you know, all our familiar issues along
[09:28] with the NHL staff, we're not going to solve those as part
[09:32] of the cyber-capist project.
[09:35] You know, we can look at things like phone walls,
[09:37] fundraising diets, but I'm really
[09:40] probably the purposes of this study.
[09:43] We need to focus on part 3.
[09:45] Because I don't think we had a great understanding
[09:50] before coming up to you.
[09:51] We got this about a month ago.
[09:53] How urgent the funding is is a long-term
[09:56] it's so far with respect to the city.
[09:58] So those are the times of things that we are proposing to do
[10:02] part of this social-capist project.
[10:04] I think that's the side of the chief of the Virginians
[10:17] and for the health of this area.
[10:19] But the second one, David, is that I think the project
[10:22] is going to focus on my role here is to bring all these
[10:28] different avenues that could be brought to bear on my amop.
[10:33] And I remember to make part of this as we possibly can
[10:36] through the field of social-capist project.
[10:38] And this is going to take a scope and to really assist my amop
[10:44] and the things that they need and then we part as if they need.
[10:48] They don't have something to say stuff to it about.
[10:51] I'm having a project that we're at this stage.
[10:54] And I feel like my biggest role here is just
[10:57] make sure we understand what our skills are.
[11:00] We're meeting and meeting those meetings where we possibly need.
[11:04] So that's my vision there.
[11:07] Right?
[11:08] So we have two different, three different projects
[11:36] that we're going to do.
[11:37] We're going to be creating the hexraz, which
[11:39] is a hydrologic engineering center room analysis system,
[11:44] perform quiz-difficulty analysis, a tar creek,
[11:47] a neo-show room, and then we'll run the economic analysis
[11:52] with the damages by rental and structure gaps.
[11:58] And then we'll go to the chief.
[12:00] Here that is what type of projects will give us to the most blood resilience, please.
[12:07] And then we'll have this complete by in and around the end of June or $0.1 per day.
[12:15] And we'll back up a mic and then we'll explain some of the brilliant details.
[12:21] And if you can, and then you'll think that's why we're going to do the idea to the agenda and to manage our work.
[12:27] Can we provide the help of the ability of the battery of the one-to-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one.
[12:43] So what we would do is build a build-up high-mic model, specifically for short-breakers.
[12:49] Our downstream battery condition will be stages of the wheelchair risker.
[12:54] And by doing that, we can depend on what the actual probability of any given flow stage upstream-one property are.
[13:04] And that is how we're going to create this complete frequency analysis.
[13:10] And by doing that, that will plan into being future steps that are taken regarding the construction of egress route,
[13:21] freezing-highways or whatever.
[13:23] You can build a true probability of flooding a long-tarpary bar.
[13:28] So, a deliverable that we will have in and from all of you is this ongoing model.
[13:41] No, I think we're right on in terms of what we're trying to execute.
[13:51] And maybe just said in the timeline that we have here.
[13:55] I think, you know, simultaneously in the impact, something that we can do that as well.
[14:02] And as we were just making out a list, one whoever is in terms of the numbers of location of the impacts,
[14:11] for the amount of height and type of impacts that we have.
[14:15] I think we go a long way for any kind of nests facing we have in terms of reducing our planning,
[14:21] our radiation projects, other than that one, or maybe I think the nice part about this too.
[14:27] So, we've got the natural has a mitigation association.
[14:30] That is a nationwide nonprofit that has a grant from FEMA to print up this exact type of project,
[14:37] that are interested in partnering with us.
[14:40] I think they go a long way and try to put together the impacts that we need to bring everything together to make this up.
[14:50] You know, thought that we can really look at it and use the ability to document.
[14:57] The one where example would be there or something.
[15:00] different types of grants out there and I've been going to say everything about you with that.
[15:04] And since we can do that, I'm not all who are sponsoring, taking that responsibility,
[15:10] who are kind of a variation ever may need to listen to the amount of your money people that are coming.
[15:17] Right now, that impacts some orders and the responsibility to get all that done with the mediation project,
[15:24] but it's raising a road where whatever that might be,
[15:27] but also tapping into the federal agency that we know,
[15:31] and then each and every does this very well,
[15:33] bring farmers together, the determination of the Zainbal Disability,
[15:37] traditional grant money, but you're planning for mediation funds for the OEM,
[15:42] or who that's another program that's out there or something.
[15:47] I think that's one of the key things as well as our team.
[15:50] We're taking the data that we have,
[15:52] and we're going to have this performance based, right?
[15:55] Saying, hey, we got a lot of data.
[15:58] This is what we think we can do in terms of reducing impacts.
[16:03] But then we can also say, oh, this is how we can do it.
[16:06] And then very often say, about doing all these things that we've done,
[16:11] we reduce the impacts through both the structure of the structure of the people,
[16:17] and businesses, but also economically, for my own money.
[16:22] So I think that's a very, very, very, very, very role this up.
[16:26] There's a lot of other communities that do things that kind of thing.
[16:30] This is going to be a great example of that.
[16:33] Another thing I have a lot of impact to the importance,
[16:35] cohesion, we're considering putting it in a level.
[16:38] And it does a lot of stuff that protects the infrastructure that's behind that,
[16:43] and that would be behind that level.
[16:46] But it also is a great selling point.
[16:49] So the portfolio says, hey, $20 million,
[16:54] you know, companies also come at it and put money in the scope of the data,
[16:59] say back, we're not going to have that problem here.
[17:01] We'll be like that because we did this slide the right thing.
[17:05] That's one of the benefits from these types of projects.
[17:09] So all of them gets over, we'll need to be able to tie our resiliency efforts to be ending
[17:14] on the impact and the economic structure on the impact.
[17:19] I have to be able to say, hey, $20 million, so I think that's one of the key things.
[17:24] I think we can do with the diversity of partners and the naturalized innovation association
[17:29] that we might have to make that happen.
[17:31] I think that's the only way to do that slide.
[17:40] I'll take down the energy and then I'll do that again.
[17:43] I'll be doing a little bit.
[18:20] I'm pretty sure that I sent out the riddic with that.
[18:23] We're most about all you guys able to get the riddic copy of the PowerPoint.
[18:27] No, we were not going to read it, so whole group didn't get to be identified as the piece like people.
[18:32] But I don't know if that's going to be a good factor in words.
[18:35] Sure.
[18:36] Okay.
[18:37] But this slide basically entails is that there are already really good mapping products,
[18:46] where we know that the funding is going to be,
[18:48] and we will leverage the feeble website and the USGS website.
[18:55] It's really very resources, and so we won't be using those.
[19:00] The feeble flood mapping was updated as of last year,
[19:04] which is already a great benefit with the profile,
[19:07] specifically in the top three people on one.
[19:10] So we will be using those on our analysis.
[19:18] And so we know that the city might not work with how to attend
[19:22] in some of the other ways that the profile is a rose,
[19:25] but there are some of the main secondary tertiary,
[19:30] ingress and egress routes that were identified by one of your,
[19:35] your street person on,
[19:38] rather than back in the back.
[19:42] Robert, yeah.
[19:44] So we took that data in,
[19:48] if we will specifically be looking at those three areas,
[19:52] or the raising the street profile,
[19:56] one by the Northeast,
[19:59] A&M, University,
[20:02] believe that was what the main street central central avenue.
[20:08] There's one above the north that goes the cuts across our street
[20:12] for that's 20 seconds.
[20:14] And then there's, I believe it's,
[20:17] I'm going to say no.
[20:19] There's a pasture right there,
[20:22] there's a low area.
[20:23] So we had some of our hydrologists take a quick look at that,
[20:27] and I think you're right on the money,
[20:29] as far as those ingress egress routes.
[20:31] So the point is for us not to do all the work,
[20:34] but it's a nest in these larger methods.
[20:37] There's a lot of different pools of the monies
[20:42] and the efforts that we can support
[20:46] and nest our analysis.
[21:00] Also, I'm going to look at your critical infrastructure,
[21:04] fully-station, schools, nursing home,
[21:06] le medications,aminopalk benefits and analysis.
[21:10] I'm going to go ahead and put David and,
[21:12] have a bit of a lot of on the line.
[21:17] Thank you, David.
[21:18] Hey, David.
[21:18] My name is Rayner.
[21:20] I read a lot of the helpful stuff.
[21:22] I apologize.
[21:24] I'll be here.
[21:25] I think you've heard that you have
[21:27] I think that we have talked about is that in the end of the flood it's not just people who are at the end of the address from the flood that you have people who have things such as medical conditions that they have nothing to do with the flood.
[21:52] I think it's hard to tackle something but if you don't have the ability to respond to them at the time of the matter and it's a hospital that's a real problem.
[22:03] I think that we have a lot of people who are very clear about the problem concerning egress during the event of flood.
[22:13] But one of my takeaways was this is really something you look at and figure out based on economic analysis.
[22:21] You know, where do you get the most of the time for your walk in terms of being able to get the cross-country and over to interstate 24.
[22:31] You know, you know, you get that's right on your career.
[22:44] But there's so many different variables to the media, you just try to get some of your risks.
[22:51] There are areas of hazards that we can get in the rest of this.
[22:54] And I think it's so multi-functional that it really fits all of the civil-directed coordination and really fits well.
[23:01] Some of the things that we've done in my hand up, you know, in the past.
[23:06] And one of the nice things about the Civil Technical Program is this we start to move through this data gathering.
[23:13] That data in into some of these other phases, there's a lot of tools and the civil-directed tool kit that we can bring up.
[23:21] And you can help me out in terms of, you know, our risk communication and communication.
[23:27] And the civil-directed exercise is no less all that good stuff.
[23:32] And wrapping this into a, you know, effective, effective document.
[23:37] But we can continue to build upon with our partners.
[23:41] We're going to come to you up with a need for the body.
[23:51] In a few months or so, I'm not wrong.
[24:00] I don't know if I can go and say any of those said,
[24:05] you know, good thing that's going to come out of this,
[24:08] you know, I'll be practicing my own area.
[24:11] It's not only in the sort that it's going to bring
[24:15] but I'm going to say some words out of the water,
[24:17] but it's going to be easy strategy and the water,
[24:20] but basically one thing,
[24:22] one thing that you should make sure you start looking at
[24:25] and you should find out about what you're going to do.
[24:28] You know, why don't we talk about the water?
[24:31] You can also have some kind of stuff right now,
[24:35] what they call the drugs and why why that's.
[24:38] So, you know, as you can see,
[24:41] the investigation, the investigation,
[24:44] and then you also have a little bit of an opportunity
[24:46] as well as going to do whatever it is you can do,
[24:49] and it's going to be a little bit of an opportunity
[24:52] to do whatever you want.
[24:55] So, I think we're going to get a brush,
[24:57] and maybe this is trying to do it with me.
[25:00] I'm understanding that something you're doing now,
[25:03] but I think it's going to take a little bit of a while to do it
[25:06] to get through some of these,
[25:07] and we'll just start coming up with, you know,
[25:10] if you don't want for two years,
[25:12] how to keep doing it, if you're going to do that.
[25:15] So, you know,
[25:17] if you're going to do it, if you're going to do that.
[25:20] So, yeah, definitely more of us to all become out of this.
[25:25] So, don't worry, thanks a little bit.
[25:32] So, we'll take a round of the day,
[25:34] and I'm going to come here to help you to
[25:37] the people available,
[25:40] and here to be a round man,
[25:42] that's the one that's coming up and talking about,
[25:44] and I'll say,
[25:45] to the ground in the audio,
[25:47] and we'll see that,
[25:48] and that's what we've been doing today.
[25:50] Does anybody have any questions for
[25:54] Bill, David,
[25:56] or Matt Rawls?
[25:58] There? Okay.
[25:59] So, this is quite a funny question.
[26:07] No problem.
[26:08] I'm ready to go.
[26:09] I'm going to ask you a question.
[26:10] On this time,
[26:11] I'd like to first start with time to
[26:13] on all of this line,
[26:15] which I think is going to show you
[26:17] a clear,
[26:18] clear,
[26:19] clear,
[26:20] clear,
[26:21] clear,
[26:22] clear,
[26:23] clear,
[26:24] clear,
[26:30] clear,
[26:31] clear,
[26:35] clear, clear,
[26:36] clear, clear, clear,
[26:38] project, which will effectively run for about six months, is intended to tell you what
[26:44] economic benefit you get from raising those serial errors because you need to do things
[26:49] with the benefit and what's the cost. And the so-called economic project is not a construction
[26:56] project, it's a state. So we're going to give you...
[27:00] heart of information that you as a community needs to go forward and say, okay, we can show
[27:07] a bit that we're going to get through doing this, can we justify the cost?
[27:11] Yeah, I remember that from the day we said this is these absolute right, the technical parts of the program.
[27:23] We'll tell you that today is that information, you know what's that cost and it is effective to you.
[27:31] I think we also will do, and I will also react to this, is no, this type of thing.
[27:37] It's just going to, we want to just leave you there with added information.
[27:41] I'll be right through a process in terms of grants that would be best for your city,
[27:49] coordinator of those folks that will provide those grants.
[27:53] We'll be talking about potential options to record and actually include additional studies that were available.
[28:03] And then, response planning in terms of what is going to do in the meantime.
[28:08] And then, we want something to start to work towards a project.
[28:13] And we integrate that with your political planning.
[28:17] And the reason I say that is because that will goes into the core project.
[28:22] So we're gonna start in the core program, that's an argument, shop, and you guys are familiar with this opportunity for that, you know.
[28:27] So while we're doing all the studying, we're analyzing the looking and we're developing an adjacent strategies.
[28:33] You know, the big program that state federal government uses for planning is a four-flip program.
[28:41] So we're trying to figure out how we can plug in the backflip program and knowing this information is pretty cool for that.
[28:49] So it's about a task that we have there.
[28:51] That's a lot of people.
[28:59] I know this is one of these.
[29:00] I did.
[29:01] I'm a couple of years.
[29:02] All right.
[29:03] I'm going to talk to you about this.
[29:04] You have a product.
[29:07] It's a great job there.
[29:09] It's absolutely awesome.
[29:11] It's been a good one.
[29:12] I feel like I'm sitting there this morning, it's been here for a bit.
[29:16] It's been a great day.
[29:17] I'm not going to talk about being a blogger.
[29:19] I want to say, I will tell you that this is the other agenda.
[29:22] I'm going to talk about it better now.
[29:24] I'm going to tell you that.
[29:26] I could not explain to you if it didn't show you this.
[29:41] You can't explain to me to look.
[29:48] That's what I did.
[29:51] I think that you showed.
[29:54] I will be happy to have a great day here.
[30:03] So I'm with you. I love action too. The other way on this call, I'll be able to see the
[30:09] need to sort of pretend like there's not a, a, a, a, a substantial flat sheet of the
[30:14] seat of my animal. And so this part of the story again is a six month piece to look more
[30:22] specifically at the benefits of what we're going to have to do in working coordination with
[30:27] this. It's identified in a way to also look at the cost because we're going to need
[30:33] it if, if you pursue a federal funding for any time to have a project, this is just a
[30:38] part of that process. It will be completely, it's, since we're getting started with the
[30:43] end of this subject, it will all ready to be completed. You won't have to go back and
[30:47] redo this, but we have to know the benefits and we have to know the cost. So we're going to
[30:52] get the benefits built. We're going to work with here now. And also, returning
[30:57] cost based on fair, and we've got a second, you know which, which route is the
[31:03] upgrades. This is the state building. This is the road. This is the server seat building.
[31:06] Which we have a shorter lead from you can have to have to do something. So we've got
[31:12] to really stand before we can do the floor and try to get federal money to have a project.
[31:21] So, yeah, I think to me it seems like we've got this, the total output on the project
[31:35] for these six months, right?
[31:37] And probably some new silver jackets when we're running this analysis, maybe the folks
[31:45] are doing that, right around the four month period.
[31:51] My folks will start getting a Mac, maybe it's the most important information
[31:57] that our partners talk with you in meetings and trying to get a good idea of what the
[32:04] grants that you can possibly have.
[32:06] So, the purpose of that is so, the important thing, maybe it's done with this analysis.
[32:12] We can hit the ground running pretty quickly to have an idea about where we're
[32:17] back to the future and what we used to be done.
[32:19] I think the more folks who we did involved with this, and I know FEMA's already involved,
[32:25] and I know, I mentioned the core of national health evaluation in our headquarters silver
[32:30] jacket, I was seeing that the more partners we did to we find that the more partners we did to
[32:35] the table there are the most solutions, right?
[32:37] You know, the shareholders want to go down to that, but if we take that responsibility to share
[32:43] more, then if I didn't want to get involved, so let's see the intent about this four month
[32:48] mark.
[32:49] We'll restart kind of mass things up with what we're basically receiving and what we're thinking,
[32:54] and then try to get trying to close that target and then the best things to do.
[33:00] on 7th of timeframe will be at the group.
[33:03] Probably I'm going to move it with matching up
[33:05] with brands and getting some portion of action.
[33:10] So I think that's a lot of the easiest way to go over that.
[33:12] I mean, there's a couple of other portion of action
[33:14] that we're looking at, and I'll come back a little bit
[33:18] in terms of some other organizations that we have
[33:20] might be able to provide for me.
[33:22] So we are looking at those right now,
[33:23] just looking at what I'm seeing.
[33:25] We don't have any information that provides it,
[33:27] but certainly we will hold some on that.
[33:31] So there's some looking at, there's additional information
[33:34] that we don't have to be looking at,
[33:37] we don't kind of wrap this up at a package.
[33:40] We're going to be able to really lay out a presentation
[33:45] on a way forward in the next steps.
[33:47] I would say that's probably in the eight month time for any of them.
[33:53] So we're going to go through the third of the June,
[33:56] for the final presentation of the benefit analysis.
[34:01] Certainly we will have a really good picture
[34:04] about where we're going to target for our additional funding
[34:08] brands and what we need it.
[34:12] Something that you can, I'm not going to stress in,
[34:15] obviously I would say, make sure you give a present back.
[34:18] Yeah.
[34:19] And that's for you, forward.
[34:26] Hey, back.
[34:27] Can you read the paper?
[34:29] Can you read the paper?
[34:31] Can you read the paper?
[34:32] Can you read the paper?
[34:33] Can you read the paper?
[34:34] Can you read the paper?
[34:35] Can you read the paper?
[34:38] Okay.
[34:39] Yeah.
[34:40] So it kind of looked up about what I call this.
[34:43] So, can it stretch a lot of the theme of the media
[34:45] of the media, the audience, the other version of the
[34:47] media, the great program, and the great
[34:51] fidelity of the media, the culture of the media.
[34:52] It's just kind of a type of a film.
[34:55] And it's just kind of tight back to the bill, but first thing that I was telling you,
[35:02] first section is, first thing you're going to look at is that depth of cost analysis.
[35:06] And then I know what they say, just like ever federal grants.
[35:10] The final required is that some of the procedures you're going to see is going to water the benefits, water them and cost.
[35:16] And basically, I need that analysis to show that projects going to cost a certain amount of money that we're in
[35:23] to have a greater return, and we're investing the dollar so we're going to have, and you'll be saying,
[35:29] I'm not even going to put strength in animals, benefits, you know how we're going to improve those benefits.
[35:36] So, you know what?
[35:38] The solar deck is kind of helping you to sort of bring some of that big information over that way around.
[35:44] We'll take you to a detailed work, but this will need you to do something I'm really going to use to start it off with a game.
[35:51] This will say, you need to look at this.
[35:53] Here's something to start.
[35:54] The work of what it's started.
[35:55] And I'm putting together my new more data plan that I'm going to show you in the other game.
[36:00] that idea like if you have to report projects in which one's already looked at having
[36:05] positive benefit costs and then you know how to start prioritizing those which one's
[36:10] might need more work to get in there. You know, they do just something that's
[36:14] so working with those is kind of trying to get out. You know, it's running for real
[36:18] darkened in the air and sailing a set. This will help in prioritizing. You know, what
[36:24] we're going to do, I'm going to do a house plan for this. So yeah, definitely. This is very
[36:30] good information. You guys can be able to use. So yeah, because I'm even there. So
[36:36] there you know, yeah, thank you. I think you know, when I'm going to talk about
[36:41] new offices and I think it's very time to talk about one of the awesome line when I'm working
[36:46] on these projects is that there's a little nuance differences between how the four of us
[36:52] are about positive benefit analysis. And it's only positive benefit analysis information
[36:57] that you like to see when they're trying for a grant. So one of the lines is to see what we're working
[37:04] on. It's important to have that for a team up. So when we do get the final product, we'll be able
[37:10] to say, okay, we got this great positive benefit analysis and it is something that we can use
[37:17] all these different types of grants. So we're just not stuck. And basically, our self-sense
[37:23] speaking in a certain area, we'll be able to apply for certain types of grants to be done. RBCA,
[37:28] certain way in the core, it doesn't necessarily match up. So that's the time to think ahead.
[37:33] We're trying to look ahead and make sure that the information that we did all for you is useful
[37:39] and all the different spectrum grants you may decide to apply for.
[37:43] We have to make it possible because it will sit in a 30 degree degree degree degree.
[38:03] So the sixth month's cost of this degree is a great period and I think they've held up the exam, it's not bad.
[38:12] So the objectives has no that it's going to be great because I'm so jackasses.
[38:16] We look through the state of communication team. We have a lot of interaction with my own already.
[38:22] We're talking about doing an additional project in Syria.
[38:26] There was a lot of interest from not only local, state, federal, groups and youth stakeholders
[38:35] that wanted to see this happen. So we apply for it to guide it.
[38:39] It's a 100,000 dollar project and there's no cost shared to you.
[38:44] I don't know if I can afford that kind of awesome.
[38:46] But we'll understand federal. That's working for you.
[39:01] Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
[39:03] We will be able to get away from our readers
[39:05] or the audience that won't even.
[39:09] OK, so just kind of in summary.
[39:13] There's four things that we're going to look at.
[39:15] We're going to look at the street profile,
[39:19] the reason I don't know what we're not going to try to do.
[39:22] We're not doing the thing that you're ever trying to do with the hearing curve.
[39:26] We're going to look at those three main and you're going to see
[39:29] there's a three secondary tertiary,
[39:31] to the University of Toronto.
[39:33] Now, look at how we can, are steep open goal, or if you look at that,
[39:38] central 20 second and out.
[39:40] It's a great perfect.
[39:42] And I think that that mess in the yard, or it's a full district.
[39:45] Is there anything you'd like to ask a question?
[39:47] Is there any further further further further further further?
[39:49] We'll bring you to, is there anybody going to include
[39:51] Steve Evans and how I would 25 when you went to the study
[39:54] or 10th of October?
[39:56] No, but I guess I absolutely, I think that you want to include you.
[40:00] Yeah, I'm working for the benefit and ask purposes.
[40:03] Yes.
[40:04] Right.
[40:05] So, that's where you're going to give you four codes, right?
[40:08] You're a four foot minigation.
[40:11] You're probably trying to misconnect it to a larger,
[40:15] full of risk minigation master's like, right?
[40:19] But everybody wants the road for a following risk experience.
[40:22] That's a way in which you can do it if anybody, any commander,
[40:25] one course of action doesn't work that way.
[40:28] Yeah, you know, it's a good one and a good one.
[40:32] What we need to do.
[40:33] The next one is the buyback for the buyback for the buyback for the buyback for
[40:36] and we're going to specifically look at all of the property
[40:38] south of Steve Evans Boulevard.
[40:40] As per your guys' feedback, that's something that you ordered to choose.
[40:45] The number three is...
[40:49] I don't really want to go to the state here.
[40:51] Oh, yeah.
[40:56] Channel channel improvements a long-tard tree
[40:59] specifically about long-tard.
[41:01] Because they're not, you know, just a bunch of small roads
[41:05] and low water crossings over those channel projects.
[41:10] So, for example, we just finished up a video channel project
[41:14] in Big Speed Oklahoma,
[41:16] which they got through the field in 499 project.
[41:22] It was a core video channel project,
[41:25] which really doesn't do a lot of channel projects,
[41:28] but we're going to do some things.
[41:29] So, this is a perfect example.
[41:31] Since dark green and done long run,
[41:33] I have so much flash-footed issues,
[41:35] and it splits the tower into two,
[41:37] and then, next into the larger rating of the Nio show river,
[41:41] which exacerbates that problem.
[41:43] That's your next set of kind of analysis.
[41:44] I think that's really close to number two.
[41:46] Because of the way that it splits the police station
[41:49] and the hospitals for your risk analysis.
[41:53] So, I would say that's probably pretty close to number two.
[41:57] Number three.
[42:00] I hope you buy back program in the number four,
[42:03] the analysis that we're going to be looking at,
[42:05] is the dyke and let me structure a log in the OSHA
[42:08] river.
[42:09] Probably a mental benefit, and probably it's
[42:12] extraordinarily high cost.
[42:14] But if you're going to go on a massive point,
[42:16] the money was an initiative, and we all, you know,
[42:19] to the jackpot that we could see no out there,
[42:21] then we could go away.
[42:24] Okay.
[42:25] I think the last thing is that when each one of those
[42:28] of those courses of action, we run the HECRAS,
[42:33] which is a show with about 500 year
[42:36] of one probability over all those
[42:38] infrastructures and what the economic,
[42:41] what are the economics behind,
[42:43] and if you throw all those different structures,
[42:46] then we run the coincident frequency analysis,
[42:52] which nests into that.
[42:54] So there's like kind of a hydrology study,
[42:56] and then there's a frequency probability study in there.
[42:58] Then we run the economic analysis, and then we spit,
[43:02] you know, all those different little studies into those
[43:05] each course of action, and it kind of gives you a
[43:08] right structure of what you do.
[43:09] That's what you'll have in your pocket,
[43:12] that you can do on your stock market.
[43:14] Does that make it a little more clear?
[43:16] I know that these guys have talked about a lot of money
[43:19] and they've talked about it, and that's a good federal
[43:22] state dollars.
[43:23] But if that's what this effort is,
[43:27] you have to put your money in.
[43:30] If you need to put it in the,
[43:32] five miles per hour, you have to be done.
[43:35] You have to do it right now.
[43:36] If you need to put the money in,
[43:38] you go back and go down to the Internet,
[43:40] or you will need it and you can do it.
[43:45] That's what this is going to be.
[43:46] Be the place, but by and by and by the Office of the Platoon
[43:54] Centers.
[43:55] I think you might think of the five.
[43:58] Yes, we'll just have to do a little bit of a thier way.
[44:00] Later on, we'll just have to do it.
[44:02] Yes.
[44:03] Yes, but you got to put it?
[44:06] Okay, so I mean, I mean, it's this, I mean, it's, it's, it's on, going and even this, if you,
[44:18] so they're all out.
[44:19] So I was about to start over in the minus, you know, going to start pouring, you know, I mean,
[44:24] the statement has been by house, college server.
[44:27] Always, maybe more, on 10 years or so.
[44:30] Exactly.
[44:31] I mean, I'm not sure if you look for specific things.
[44:34] It's nothing but a change in cell A, you know, it's not a fee, but it's still 75% 20% of all.
[44:42] So it's a very nice social property, is it in a buy?
[44:47] Yes, and we'll say it has a buy.
[44:50] For additional negative funds to advertise some of those structures.
[44:56] Specifically, they're at kind of one is there.
[45:00] And she might kind of go through specifically by areas that are currently out of right now, so I mean.
[45:08] So yes, the one way to buy it, the buy-off acquisition, dental insurance, still ongoing.
[45:14] We still prioritize those for flood related disasters.
[45:18] So, you know, yes, so it's still ongoing.
[45:24] And if the buy-off acquisition is in the question 14, there's the same detail.
[45:30] And another property or kind of a vulnerability for it.
[45:34] So, thank you.
[45:35] We actually have two different buy-back opportunities that we're looking at right now.
[45:40] Working with Linda Plun is, I think Tyler's going to update you on tonight, later on.
[45:46] And that involves red text structures from the 2019 one.
[45:51] And that really, if the 2007 flood had been handled appropriately, would have never gotten, they wouldn't have been there.
[45:57] So, they wouldn't have gotten water in them this time.
[46:01] And then the other buy-back that we're trying to address is, the low and smooth art.
[46:07] And the properties of low and smooth art that have repetitive flooding.
[46:12] That's, you know, multi-million dollar buy-back that we're working with.
[46:17] The first one that Tyler's going to update you on tonight is more, really focuses on residential structures.
[46:27] He's asking the, we have more questions to the guys on the board that bought it.
[46:31] And we've kept those loose, though, they buy the questions for them.
[46:37] Blas, are you, you're saying the property south of Steve Owens?
[46:42] What specific properties are you talking about?
[46:45] Are you talking about the fairgrounds?
[46:47] He just said that by that program, which was the property south of Steve Owens, Tom Lasson,
[46:54] of what he meant by that deco.
[46:58] Right, so in the last, when you know, when I saw him over here, that was a concern of the flood-prone areas, specifically south of Steve Owens,
[47:12] Steve Owens will do it or not.
[47:13] I know that that's not a catch-all, but that's not every single property south of there.
[47:17] They think they're talking about southeast, and that was an initial, we were talking about that.
[47:20] That was Steve Owens, or did a living, what would happen to the property?
[47:23] Right, it's in a flood-proofing, I mean, why would you flood-proof a house if it's going to flood actually?
[47:28] Okay.
[47:29] That would be that, it's a commitment.
[47:31] I think that's what that's.
[47:32] Because we're in the middle of applying for mitigation funds now.
[47:37] Yeah.
[47:38] So I just didn't know if he was talking about some other properties.
[47:44] Okay.
[47:45] We're clear.
[47:46] Hi.
[47:48] Is there anything else?
[47:49] Guys, I know I'm going to say that I come to this meeting's longings.
[47:52] You know, it's kind of obviously focused on, you know, this particular thing is on, on another thing.
[47:57] So I'm going to cut these guys into two.
[48:00] You guys are having a question.
[48:03] These guys, they're having a question.
[48:05] They're all very good.
[48:06] They're all very good.
[48:07] They're all very good.
[48:08] They're all very good.
[48:09] They're all very good.
[48:10] They're all very good.
[48:11] No.
[48:15] No, no, no, no, no, no.
[48:16] I have other than the fact that, you know,
[48:17] I guess, no, I really appreciate the opportunity to continue
[48:21] to my Emma projects.
[48:24] No, I'm going to make great partnerships to do all
[48:27] great things.
[48:28] And only, for example, that is,
[48:30] I mean, I want to be in, in, in,
[48:32] a long, uh, emergency management has, uh,
[48:35] uh, copyright additional funding for that, for my house.
[48:39] I think, more continued discussions on this,
[48:42] and more people we can get involved with this,
[48:44] and more people will be interested in the LA,
[48:46] the White House, something that's, over all that's,
[48:49] kind of the approach for taking, um,
[48:51] and then execute those technical comments.
[48:54] Over.
[48:58] But I would just like to say,
[48:59] thank you everyone for,
[49:01] uh, your time receiving, and, um,
[49:04] I'm looking forward to working on this project,
[49:06] and, uh, we certainly intend to,
[49:08] to deliver something to you that you can use moving forward.
[49:11] I didn't find sources of funding, um,
[49:14] to, uh, hear some of these questions.
[49:16] Thank you.
[49:17] Now, this is kind of wrap up, uh,
[49:22] yeah, definitely a little bit of a part of this.
[49:24] You have to make great strides.
[49:26] Now, the last year,
[49:27] maybe, uh, I have plenty of issues, uh,
[49:30] looking at some of these,
[49:32] emphasis on the rough projects and the major projects.
[49:35] I think that I'll have to know your community to,
[49:37] my strong, more, Z, and both kind of have to try that out,
[49:40] recovery.
[49:41] Uh, so definitely, I think we're,
[49:44] we're going to try a cure, uh,
[49:46] so we really have to see the other,
[49:47] we come up with some strength, and then,
[49:49] all of the government there.
[49:50] So, and thank you for letting us in,
[49:52] and for sharing our comments,
[49:54] and, uh, again, we'll see what we come up with.
[49:57] Thank you.
[49:58] Thank you.
[50:01] Thank you.
[50:02] If you're time off us in here,
[50:03] just, uh, just kind of be a line of welfare,
[50:06] the best of me.
[50:30] And the odd learning is same thing to do,
[50:34] uh, with this COVID-19 irony on how to do the virtual meetings,
[50:38] that, maybe, I don't know,
[50:39] it's not a good thing anymore,
[50:40] but, you know, there's obviously,
[50:41] for improvement on this,
[50:42] but I really do appreciate your patience,
[50:45] uh, which I would get some of, you know,
[50:47] the stakeholders online, uh,
[50:49] which I would get some of, you know,
[50:51] the stakeholders online,
[50:53] um,
[50:54] try to get some of that,
[50:56] we'll be back first,
[50:57] uh, really get some.
[51:00] The first moving in dirt, dirt flying, you know, as far as improvement, I think that's
[51:07] really the answer to that you want, you want roads that have a higher elevation, that
[51:11] could withstand the flooding.
[51:12] If you want to channelize drainage on your, on your streets and your channel projects, more
[51:24] work, we're going to solve that, I would say that it's probably your number one and two
[51:29] make clear bumps.
[51:30] So, I really appreciate you and my ask that you don't try to help out the better, and I'm going
[51:39] to say here, I'm going to leave you guys a little bit of my questions, if you want to go
[51:44] on to the answer, thank you, thank you.
[51:47] Now, we're going to flip law four and five, so we're going to go to the five, we'll see
[51:54] what I'm going to talk about in the specifics today, if you can, if you want to do that.
[51:59] Yes.
[52:00] I hope everybody can hear me on today, I was happy to be able to tell that the chassis was not going
[52:07] to be at the end because the information I had for you is still not going to regret, but it's
[52:13] much improved over the way you've done in the first test, and I'm sorry, it's not going to be
[52:21] not here, but at this point we're going to go to work and put it into it, but it's very
[52:26] interesting.
[52:27] Anyway, the first three pages of the handout that you have are my effort to try to make the
[52:36] expenditures that the city has had up to this point will use your time to understand a couple of
[52:43] things that I can tell you, for instance, I said it's my correct.
[52:48] My calculations are somewhere around 17,000 people, I haven't figured out where that is
[52:56] incorrect, and we tend to get that figured out that you have a complete correct document that
[53:06] has been made.
[53:09] The last two pages are the spreadsheet that the city has been made for since 2008, as far
[53:21] as any expenditures get their original four empty-way, you need to not let them work, we don't
[53:29] think they're working, but we're not, but we think the information that you have on the last
[53:36] two pages are correct, and as to all the expenditures that we have, just so that you can
[53:44] understand that not in minutes, it's a poor community, a kind of weird way, if you look at the
[53:52] page, you'll see, there's big blocks that are in the public.
[54:00] And there's a block there, a pan.
[54:02] Those are dividing those all those entries by fiscal view.
[54:10] So if I block, there's all one fiscal year,
[54:12] a pan block is all the next, a fiscal year, and so on.
[54:17] That was the basic document that we've had as far as the spreadsheet.
[54:23] But I got this on end with all the different entries
[54:27] and how I quoted them.
[54:29] So you can see what all went to depotent,
[54:32] or its predecessor must have a problem
[54:37] to build on us, the surveyer, what went to a very personal firm.
[54:49] This entries are not for anything to win,
[54:54] and they must write a command, which is in tune on us.
[54:58] So we're pretty sure that all the information on this spreadsheet
[55:03] is correct as far as the expenditures.
[55:07] We're bad enough, I'm going back to my first print pages.
[55:13] For instance, in the first draft that I gave you,
[55:18] I had talked about the 1994 lawsuit for Valorant
[55:24] was the primary or the first listed binder.
[55:31] I even read the idea there that the city of Wyoming was not
[55:35] even a binder, so I was completely found out that in fact,
[55:39] that was incorrect.
[55:41] And as you can see, in the blue note there, the city received,
[55:46] $29,000, $39, that's part of the settlement
[55:52] of that lawsuit.
[55:54] That was information that we did not have at the last speed.
[56:00] The first one of the entry here is the lawsuits that have been set.
[56:09] The second one is in regards to the 2007 plan.
[56:14] And it's pretty much the same information
[56:16] that you got last time, except for the last entry there.
[56:21] We had talked about the city that had committed $300,000 to be used
[56:28] to cover the engineering and survey expenses.
[56:35] In 2016, the last entry here was decided that $200,000,
[56:43] we actually had spent.
[56:45] It was going to be, we're going to divide it.
[56:50] I have to be as well as the investigation that we've got,
[56:57] pretty concerned that the survey.
[57:00] and the engineering was used to sell that lawsuit and the party administration was used
[57:07] and is still being used to regards to the 2007 state, or the 2007 lawsuit.
[57:15] So anyway, as the Asville lawsuit was being settled between 2016 and 2017, half of that
[57:26] about a hundred thousand four hundred eighty-nine dollars thirty-four cents was re-inverse to the city.
[57:33] We had some entries that we had some money, but we didn't even know where it came from, or why.
[57:41] So anyway, again, this is new information.
[57:44] Half of what we extended to original, there's already been re-inverse to the city.
[57:50] The other half, of course, we anticipate will be re-inverse as the 2007 lawsuit is settled,
[58:04] and we're working to talk about more about that.
[58:09] We had some input figures that you were given originally, and that's what I'm talking about.
[58:16] From the third law, I'm calling back the rule curve amendment era.
[58:23] That's where GDRBA filed several amendments to the rule curve that we had to react to in order to protect our interests.
[58:35] And that's where the large amount of money was spent.
[58:43] There's that big, scientific about these, the way I divide the book, they were my best, best, best, best, best on the information that we had,
[58:52] going by fiscal years.
[58:54] It's just easier to do it like fiscal years.
[58:57] So it's not completely accurate as to how these things are divided up.
[59:03] And then the last law is the expenditures with regards to the current regulation process that GDRBA is going through.
[59:20] And the efforts that we're pursuing to have further treatment, GDRBA is not even combined with its 1992 license.
[59:33] We're alone with what they're trying to do with the current regulations.
[59:39] So on the third page of that, I think all these expenditures for all the different vendors that we're talking about,
[59:48] and put together the total amount of money that is spent in each of the different laws.
[59:56] But yeah, I'm telling you this is not big yet.
[60:00] about a $70,000 difference that I did not figure out were in 12.
[60:07] But we will.
[60:09] And as you can see, the greatest bulk of the money
[60:14] has gone through the day was right for a main offer,
[60:17] and that's a million eight.
[60:19] 500,000 to the Tetris Tech, 70,000 to the surveyer,
[60:27] and then very important.
[60:29] This long term has been paid below over 200,000.
[60:34] In that regard, actually at this point,
[60:38] I think it just pretty much feeds into what Larry is,
[60:42] is what he wanted to talk to you about,
[60:45] but you want to be able to be more of a key to it.
[60:48] I would certainly pick up on most of these items,
[60:53] and kind of slot in it that what I'm trying to give you is a framework
[60:57] as to where it came from.
[60:59] And you think this is a giant of representation.
[61:02] Hopefully a little bit easier to understand
[61:05] that the first one, and you guys are going to be able to get a 20 different directions
[61:11] of a thousand pieces of information, and it's so hard to know where to find what goes.
[61:17] Hopefully, when I'm going to make a little bit more sense,
[61:21] I'll have this topic in mind about how the Harvey's topics in mind.
[61:26] As I present, I hope that we'll have a few games as we go.
[61:33] I have one more thing, first of all, to see many questions on this.
[61:41] The only other thing that I want to say is that it was really difficult
[61:47] trying to get this together.
[61:48] I mean, I'm looking at literally hundreds and hundreds of documents
[61:53] trying to piece together this information, but when those documents were created,
[61:58] they were created, never with the anticipation that we're going to be trying to address the questions
[62:04] that we're addressing right now and looking at.
[62:08] So, you know, when I build it down from one of the vendors,
[62:15] it didn't break down into, it just covered what I then used during that building period.
[62:22] It wasn't the bottom of that as to what dealt with,
[62:25] it reminds me of what dealt with, the 92 failure to apply with the 92 license,
[62:34] or anything else like that.
[62:37] So, it's still very difficult.
[62:40] But I know that I did complete the total answers,
[62:44] maybe to the extent that Mr. Chastee and Watson,
[62:47] but we're trying to get you the best information we can on the city's part
[62:52] by the same token.
[62:54] We didn't split it in and out when we got little's in.
[62:58] I mean, you know, something looked in.
[63:00] to see natural death and bear with death, I know, I'm not sure that they appear to be correct
[63:06] bills or the amount of stuff that had gone on in the previous time, or try to find
[63:12] a way to divert. So we did everything we can, I believe, you know, I'm not sure it was
[63:19] as accurate as we can, but it's still hard to be certain that we've never had this one.
[63:27] So with that, if there's any questions, I mean, glad to answer, I think you got a lot of things
[63:32] on the plate today, so I really like to move on to a very much huge debt.
[63:38] Well, I think part of the problem is, we're not taking over the bills that gone,
[63:42] because I didn't just have a amount of money, but this is horrible.
[63:48] You know, I don't know, all the back, I don't want a lot of money, so that's what we're getting
[63:52] out of the lives of these things. So, they were right in my bills. I mean, I've got
[63:58] clients, but I don't like those bills, but they're just the outpatient of the time,
[64:04] but specifically, whether it was read by someone personally, I need to do
[64:09] versus, you know, that's what they're like. And the other thing I would add is that,
[64:13] you know, there's not a single person left at the city today in the finance department,
[64:21] so it's here when all of this start, and so, you know, we're just accepting the records
[64:28] that we have been handed down as being accurate, we think that they are, we believe that they are,
[64:36] but nobody that is here round was doing that back then. So, there are no questions in
[64:49] the next slide. I don't know if we want to add a quote or a question, I don't know if we can,
[65:04] you know what I mean with my mask, I think it's a great take it off from the presentation. I'll leave
[65:09] it on. I'll leave it on. I'll leave it on and there's a problem with somebody. So, I'm going to be extremely
[65:19] excited to be here. I love talking about this, because when you walk out here, I want you to know
[65:26] to be on the court that you are on the right of the side of this dispute, and you've been on the right
[65:34] to see if I am as a bit off the right, you're very beginning when I start at the time. And I think you've been told
[65:41] anytime to not. And you need to have that strength and that background and that knowledge going forward
[65:50] to be able to craft the best recommendations, the best deal that you might be able to craft in the future.
[66:00] I do believe that I do understand you guys want to look forward to what the options are now or here where we are.
[66:08] What's our best now in the forward?
[66:11] I would respectfully submit to the degree I can have a few minutes today.
[66:15] I can need to know some of the issues that have been discussed,
[66:20] have been addressed and attempted going forward in the past to allow you to have the foundation of going forward.
[66:28] It gives you a little bit better structure and framework as to why we are or we are.
[66:34] I'm really going to try not to dwell on that because I know your focus is important.
[66:39] It's been interesting just in this 45-minute, I think, while I'm shooting, I guess, about now.
[66:44] 15 minutes that we've been here, all the topics have been discussed in that first letter from the lady in the talk about the environmental issues.
[66:53] I've talked about property evaluation.
[66:56] It has the presentation from the argument talking about identifying the issues of the infrastructure,
[67:02] and the interests of e-breds of those reference even to the medical issue.
[67:06] I'm thinking we'll give in.
[67:08] These are all things we talked about.
[67:10] A property value, property key value, because of the flooding, all very important and part of this overall issue.
[67:19] And one of the things you're going to be coming to a conclusion very soon, if you haven't already, is because of this project,
[67:26] and the scope of the project and the complexity of the project, there is no answer that everybody is going to say that is a great answer.
[67:35] It's going to be a classic human tape.
[67:38] Focus on your priorities, get as much as you can on your priorities, might have to give a little bit on issues that are not quite as important.
[67:47] Now, as I said here today and heard from what I heard so far, I really do, who can understand your task to be too full.
[67:55] One is the platforming that is happening to you on amendments.
[67:59] The likely as a totally excluding one in my own is unlikely that totally resolved.
[68:08] So then your second scope is, for what remains, for we can't compact directly, once our investment mediation, once our best option going forward.
[68:20] And I would tell you that lots and lots of people that are trying to do what you're not to do, there is a time in place for everything.
[68:29] And I really hope that this is the time, and this is the place, and you can make progress that was not made previously.
[68:38] And I really do believe you are in a space where that could happen.
[68:42] You've got a lot of people that used to be resisting that are now setting them to going to happen, and they're going to push behind you, not resisting pushing forward.
[68:53] And I believe that would be the case.
[68:55] I believe this would be the time, or you're going to have here.
[69:00] is going to have average going to have support.
[69:03] It was not there to have a 15-year or 20 years ago.
[69:08] So I'm so I'd like to do this and because of the time
[69:12] in the hour, I'm really going to try to flow through the past
[69:15] because the past of this not was, it's not, it's not fun.
[69:20] When I talk about a mixed pay, and then I'm going to try to make
[69:25] you a touch on, at least to a degree.
[69:28] I'd like to give you a 25,000-foot bird's eye view
[69:33] of this tank of structures that then maybe some of these pieces
[69:37] may sense going forward.
[69:39] This day I was first considered in the 20s.
[69:43] At first got real traction in the birds.
[69:46] GRDA was created in 1935, with the idea
[69:50] that they would be involved in this day.
[69:53] From the very, very begin, there was a tension on this day.
[69:58] The core engineers wanted to try to control GRDA
[70:03] on a high ground, the way you get to have a high room power
[70:08] is increased by calculation, the way you get better
[70:11] with the left and the control, the decrease by calculation.
[70:15] So from the very begin, there has been this basic tension.
[70:20] The day I was presented as a pure high room view,
[70:24] it was rejected and was presented as a pure flood control day.
[70:29] It was rejected.
[70:30] The whole reason this day I'm in a set is because it has
[70:34] the dual purpose of flood control and high room.
[70:40] There have been studies when you wanted to examine,
[70:42] you just get to start building a day.
[70:46] You've got to do studies, flood control,
[70:48] flood model, and flood routing to different labels
[70:51] for this concept.
[70:53] But you're basically trying to analyze what is this day I'm going
[70:58] to change from the natural force.
[71:01] I remember the day I wasn't here to support what happened.
[71:04] Now we're going to build a day on what we would have.
[71:07] I'm guessing you have all heard or all made even harder.
[71:10] This case has been studied today.
[71:13] I wanted to do early questions once.
[71:16] OK, whether I spend studies, or whether I want to actually not study.
[71:20] What are the things that's interesting?
[71:22] I guess I have to do very good introduction to me.
[71:25] I am probably the only person that is still
[71:29] doing what I do.
[71:31] There was involved in the very beginning.
[71:34] So in 1993, when I first got involved, I did what I'm doing right now.
[71:42] Nobody else is in that role, not enough.
[71:45] There are people that were there to fall back and, like them,
[71:50] and I grew too, too, to a degree, maybe, and the other to a role.
[71:55] But I got the only one who was there from the beginning and did what I did.
[71:59] So I'm going to...
[72:00] maybe you need perspective on this.
[72:03] But the studies that were done back in the 30s and 40s
[72:06] are the same types of studies, the temperature
[72:10] is doing for you now or it's done.
[72:13] It's a different scope or style of type on the program
[72:17] where it is what the core reference the hat
[72:20] gras modeling as to the frequency and the options.
[72:25] These are all what routing type studies
[72:27] trying to determine what the difference will be.
[72:30] You have to do that before you can build the data.
[72:33] Back in the 30s and 40s.
[72:35] The core of engineers did studies.
[72:39] Black and nature, which was a private engineering
[72:42] firm on a Kansas City, did studies.
[72:45] GRDA had its own primary engineering firm,
[72:48] that was called hallway and socials.
[72:51] They did studies.
[72:52] They did these all in the late 30s.
[72:55] And then they remiss into the game in 1940s
[72:58] because immediately upon this dynamic completed
[73:03] and starting to fill, it flooded, it flooded, repeated.
[73:09] And it resulted in an open was Supreme Court
[73:11] kidding me.
[73:13] The board of education to why I asked GRDA,
[73:17] the only one who is exact, same issues that you're still
[73:20] dealing with, did that.
[73:22] And that is an extremely frustrating part to me.
[73:25] The science of this rock solid preview
[73:28] that has been analyzed by many different people,
[73:32] not a way to back down and any connection with the city.
[73:36] If anybody's saying that this is the city,
[73:40] that's trying to skew or trying to,
[73:43] but there's been on this, there are absolutely false.
[73:48] All of these early studies in the city have nothing to do with it.
[73:52] All of these studies came to basically the same conclusion.
[73:58] He should have been purchased
[74:00] to about a foundation of 77.
[74:04] I'm trying in this part not to give you a whole bunch of numbers.
[74:08] But even in this day, these months have not been purchased
[74:11] at 77.
[74:14] A initial name, even though they studied seven,
[74:17] these men should be purchased at 77 and,
[74:20] initially, when the dam first opened up,
[74:22] there was not a single in-isput purchase.
[74:25] GRDA and purchased an elevation of 75,
[74:29] but it's still considered a tragic boundary.
[74:32] What's still considered basically the length of that.
[74:35] GRDA and bought that.
[74:37] These studies have been hidden in these months
[74:40] because of the science of how this works.
[74:43] That was ignore for a number of reasons
[74:46] that I've been touched on in the world frequently.
[74:49] But I want you to know, this science, the solid,
[74:51] it's been in the third of these haven't worries
[74:54] and the city has nothing to do with it.
[74:57] So the dam is like that's the way.
[75:00] is the RDA has control or part of the tool, part of the way, and then the core of it
[75:07] generates has part of the control over the upper part of the way.
[75:11] And that's been the way it is from the beginning.
[75:14] That's been said.
[75:15] While it's so there's a concept in any or a label on the back of it.
[75:21] And you'll hear it getting around, you'll find your phrase called damn cause.
[75:27] What the back water of that is when you have moving on, coming down the river, and it means so weight.
[75:35] It helps to pile up.
[75:38] It's a scientific phenomena that was known way before Pensacola Dam was ever built.
[75:44] It was the reason that people with these riding studies are done.
[75:48] And it's something that became critical in the wider case.
[75:52] I'm not going to really go on a line bridge too because I know that's important.
[75:56] But this is an Oklahoma Supreme Court case from 1984 and 3D.
[76:01] And this is what it says about shared data is not somewhere else.
[76:05] It's about the ocean river.
[76:07] It's about flying on.
[76:09] Here's what they said.
[76:10] It is established the way on the head of the flood waters.
[76:15] Well, the end-to-station area of the water.
[76:18] We have a tendency of pile up.
[76:20] So that their elevation above sea level is greater at the point where they flow.
[76:26] And to the stationary bottom of the water.
[76:29] They are under the dam.
[76:31] So the water on the river leads to the lake.
[76:34] It's hot, piling up.
[76:35] And that elevation is higher than what the elevation is of the dam.
[76:39] This is a supreme court of finding this.
[76:42] It's not the city of Miami's position.
[76:45] It's not fiction in science.
[76:47] That's what that is known as a backwater curve.
[76:51] The defendant, which is GRDA,
[76:54] notifying the engineers of Tulsa, the cold.
[76:58] And an elevation of 74927 feet of the dam would mean an elevation of approximately 752 feet of lying pot.
[77:09] But it was told to carry out the orders previously given.
[77:13] The defendant, GRDA, and their con will medit the lake level to build out an elevation of 749 points.
[77:19] 7 feet of the dam.
[77:21] And because of the result of that water curve, the lake level of lying pot reached the approximately
[77:28] of 752 feet, or 2 feet above the elevation to which the defendant and his iron land were the weight that
[77:36] as a result of water is the weight back on the plate of school ground, causing damage, and the burden which is unscuted
[77:44] and to which GRDA is live.
[77:49] These are not recent theories that we are espousing at GRDA.
[77:52] They're not in a reasonable position so that we are taken.
[77:56] These are the things that were related to fact-19.
[78:00] three is the day that this opinion involvement in 1941 is welcome.
[78:04] For rock-solving on the law, the rock-solving of the science.
[78:09] So, why are we in this mess?
[78:11] One of the first places where this mess is, they get the time of the time
[78:16] of the early 40s, World War II of Maryland.
[78:19] So, high-grade power has now, federal government steps in,
[78:26] and takes control of the data from GRDET.
[78:29] You've got a number of federal entities that have been involved in
[78:33] as like a technical officer who all was doing one role on it in given year.
[78:38] But the point is that during the war years, it was a federal government that was involved.
[78:43] That is why at least one major reason why.
[78:47] The easements that were ultimately taken were taken in the early 40s,
[78:53] and the mid-40s, five federal government.
[78:57] So, the easements that exist, even though an effort,
[79:02] are in the name of the 10-row government, the core of engineers at this particular time.
[79:09] So, the intentions got even worse when you start considering
[79:15] my knowledge, I don't know if you have heard of it, or this is the only correlate to my knowledge,
[79:21] that allows development all the way down to the shore.
[79:25] Now, we're going to have another four-layer, and I'm going to wear a new chemical,
[79:28] around with it, but here you could.
[79:31] To my knowledge, this is literally the only way to like this in the United States,
[79:36] which is one of the reasons why it's such a mess.
[79:39] So, you've got the development all the way down to the shoreline,
[79:43] the residential, the commercial, and both sides.
[79:47] And different people want different things on those areas.
[79:52] You've got recreation.
[79:54] People want to use the labor recreation to dump wool on the floor.
[79:58] The navigation is essentially considered the mathematical water line,
[80:03] because it goes in to the Arkansas River,
[80:06] multiple hands up down to the Mississippi.
[80:09] And so, the Mississippi is a mathematical water line,
[80:12] this water can contribute to that.
[80:15] Why is that called them?
[80:17] Because there was a concept called 21-day take.
[80:21] So, when there's a flood, the core would be responsible for opening
[80:26] the blankets and trying to down in the power pool,
[80:29] except they have a wrong rate of relief.
[80:31] Then, average 21-day take, because they can't just dump it.
[80:35] It's a 21-day take.
[80:37] Now, higher than it, keep this one physical sign to the higher away from the hole.
[80:43] The impact is negative on the left.
[80:46] That's just across the poor, the prince.
[80:50] So, the longer this leg has to stay up after a flood,
[80:53] the more exposed you are to another spot.
[80:57] Another area is a fire metal, while I am alive.
[81:00] in conservation whenever labor we want to put on it, the EPA is going to bring back the
[81:06] emotional bathtub. This is the fact that so he got those people living on cold, cold,
[81:12] out there of aspect of it. So it is an extremely complex process and for whatever reason,
[81:21] positions were taken early. They probably should not have been in that place to be my
[81:28] others. There will not factually support it and find it or not true. There will
[81:35] this week I'll get into those in a second. So that's a period of time I'll get to about
[81:40] 1951. There's those of you that have been around for maybe you've done some study. 1951
[81:47] is the plug-in record. They can supply and you've never had here. After the end of the 12, I
[81:53] would have been in 2007. So you had about a hundred and forty and a few minutes on the
[81:58] plug-in was cubic feet for a second. We used 2007 to five hundred and forty and 1951
[82:06] is over 200,000. Massive, massive, massive plant. So people are that, oh my God, what's going on here?
[82:13] We'll just study it again. I'm going to show you some slides later on. What's being discussed?
[82:18] The same basic results. We need to get the easements to about 770. In the mid-40s, the
[82:26] total of government during those four years had bodies spent to 760. They knew it should be
[82:33] about 770. Pick your reasons. I don't know other than its players. There's a lot of blame going
[82:38] back and forth on these groups. Why wasn't done on a group shoot, do it on. But anyway, it was
[82:44] never done. To this day, easements in this area are generally to 760. The spike now for
[82:52] what's now, 90 years, 80 years or least. The easements should be to 770. There is no excuse for that
[83:01] of happening. And why I'm so passionate, why I'm so glad we didn't speak with you. Why I think it's
[83:06] so important to you is, when you make the presentation and ask, do one of these entities, whether
[83:13] it's political, whether it's a grandfather, or whatever, starting from the point of this,
[83:18] they've done a problem that has been identified over and over and over and over and over and
[83:24] nobody has done it. Now it was the time to do it. I think that helps you, right? You're rock solid
[83:30] on what you're asking. One of the reasons they didn't do anything back between the mid-50s and the
[83:36] mid-80s and the 10 of them out in the Hertz, because they're saying, no, what if you can point? You
[83:42] guys must have done okay with it. There's no way it was great. That's such a bad reason why
[83:49] I shouldn't be done, but that's the reason that's given. Nobody's grateful to nobody's fault,
[83:55] I'm glad it's going to be cheaper to just pay damages if somebody does it or not get fired.
[84:01] You know, we have it as an action item or withdrawing.
[84:05] Now, our area has been complicated this situation.
[84:09] Again, a higher delay information of less blood control.
[84:14] GRTA wants high delay information.
[84:19] Wow.
[84:20] They're high growth power.
[84:22] Head pressure.
[84:23] A higher delay information, more pressure on the turbines.
[84:27] A less water takes its spin the turns of the past grade.
[84:30] More power than in a fishing line.
[84:33] The power of the summer, when you want to turn on your recognition,
[84:37] there's a very vast, very most expensive, best profit item of GRTA.
[84:44] So they want to slightly tie as they possibly can have a particular delay date.
[84:49] See, it seems to be because it increases pressure.
[84:52] Increases the efficiency for them to be able to produce power.
[84:56] And that can not be disputed.
[84:59] They increase the effect of original operation before 1992.
[85:04] This plate would break it only at 7.30.
[85:07] I'm going to tell you what I'm going to hit you with a whole bunch of numbers early on here.
[85:12] 7.35.
[85:13] That was a great delay.
[85:15] 7.42.
[85:16] 7.43.
[85:17] 7.45.
[85:19] 10.5.
[85:20] Is GRTA once higher?
[85:22] They've been allowed to bring it up high.
[85:24] The reason for that is, or power, power of power,
[85:28] cheap to power, or efficient power, five out of the expense of 120.
[85:32] It is true that my position, that GRTA can create cheap power
[85:37] because of the using the city of Miami.
[85:40] Because of not doing what they should have done,
[85:43] the support to city of Miami from the very beginning.
[85:46] So you guys are paying for that cheap power,
[85:49] and GRTA is created.
[85:53] The elements of the back cover, from early in the 8th,
[85:56] 10 of the 12 down the river, the lake elevation,
[85:59] those are the two primary, there are many hundreds beyond that.
[86:04] There's a concept called GRTA.
[86:06] I'm going to be heard in GRTA.
[86:08] But in the license, there's a GRTA.
[86:10] What that does is to say,
[86:12] anytime and time, what should this plate be at?
[86:16] What should this plate be at?
[86:19] And it is regular almost, it could even be more frequently than not.
[86:25] But if regularly happens, the delay is higher than the local.
[86:29] Higher than the local.
[86:31] That's how I first got involved with something other than the state litigation.
[86:36] As I knew, the delay was being kept too high.
[86:40] And so one of my first subliminalist presentations
[86:43] to further outside of the state litigation was in this area
[86:47] and I had all of them.
[86:49] I had them all.
[86:51] I can show you dreams and dreams and dreams
[86:53] and dreams and dreams and graphs and graphs.
[86:55] How this is not being complied with the local is not being settled.
[87:00] to find. Everybody's different higher than they should be when you have opportunity to draw
[87:05] the draw. So, GRDA not only can kind of push it out and out enough, the way they even
[87:11] want to go all down higher, they still have to higher even than what to rule for a low
[87:17] thing. That was back to the invariance and the amendment to things that have been written.
[87:24] There's a concept called, same with a store that has stormed out to the management
[87:31] program. You're supposed to be dreamed of you. There's supposed to be
[87:35] dreamed of you. There's supposed to be free or leasing when they know the water is coming down
[87:39] the system. They use that as a rationale as to why they should be able to introduce
[87:44] the lay-up because when the folks come in, we're going to apply our stamp and we're going
[87:50] to get a problem that very seldom does work at one. That almost always wait until
[87:57] it's too late. It's already in the flood stage. You're already getting flooded before
[88:03] the program will pre-glaces. You're no longer pre-glaces. It's good to turn as a pleasure.
[88:08] Action way out. Another item in current license, this is an item that you want to pay attention to.
[88:16] One of the things you're currently doing is you are appealing.
[88:21] The clerk for the group, the GRDA, is not violating its current license.
[88:28] The obligation is to violate the current license because they have not satisfied one of the conditions of the license,
[88:38] which is that they were buying all of the interest in all of the property that's necessary
[88:44] for the operation. Very strong, very great argument was presented to the clerk on this
[88:53] but a lot of it. Her basic plate back off on it said,
[88:57] now I can say to you, that's the order you're appealing for the city,
[89:03] but by hand it's appealing to the district floor. It has a lot of teeth, a lot of science.
[89:10] If you get outside of the clerk, we're going to have a great chance of success at the DC Circuit.
[89:17] They are violating this.
[89:21] An opportunity to check in the analysis of the operation of consequent the damn in the grand way,
[89:29] shows that they need four and seven to five of the 60 of these months for the operation
[89:39] of the operation of this project.
[89:43] That's one of those documents we talked about.
[89:47] In 92, what was the city doing on re-licensed and right now?
[89:52] How quickly why you are here is because of the expense that has been been incurred of the...
[90:00] This is reliance on saying for a license starting in 1992 and was originally supposed to end in 2022.
[90:10] What did the city do that license in process?
[90:15] Absolutely simple.
[90:18] And if it wasn't anybody's fault at the city, it would be because you didn't know what we know now.
[90:25] We didn't have the documents back then.
[90:27] We didn't have the data back then.
[90:29] We didn't have the support back then.
[90:31] And we had that.
[90:33] So this reminds me of which was originally supposed to occur in 2022.
[90:38] Now it's been a push to 2025.
[90:41] The one that you're involved in right now is constantly a lot of money that I know is constantly a lot of pain.
[90:47] It is the fight of the century.
[90:50] It is the fight for the city of Miami.
[90:53] You are so engaged, so participatory.
[90:57] You have the try to turn one in one.
[91:00] This is something that is more changed.
[91:03] Put the pressure on G.R.D.A.
[91:05] Put the pressure on the court.
[91:07] And on politicians.
[91:10] To be able to look at this thing.
[91:13] Look at it again.
[91:14] Look at it as a major problem.
[91:16] Bring everybody into the table.
[91:18] Say what can we do about this?
[91:20] First, acknowledge the problem, minimize the problem.
[91:24] And let's talk about what can't happen.
[91:26] That's what else can we do to immediate situation.
[91:31] We can bring that this the same.
[91:33] The 92 license.
[91:35] And as many aspects of it to protect it,
[91:39] great enough.
[91:40] And the migrant toward a longer fall.
[91:42] A long of a long time.
[91:45] The parents are trying to report.
[91:48] And not to protect the city of Miami.
[91:51] Because you want to happen.
[91:53] Because you didn't know.
[91:55] Now you know everything will be happening.
[91:57] In 92, many things changed.
[92:01] I was engaged.
[92:03] The first time in November of 93.
[92:05] There had been plenty of 86.
[92:07] People in the city were saying, hey, they shouldn't have happened.
[92:11] They were talking back while they were playing.
[92:13] They were talking to the city.
[92:15] But they didn't have these actual studies.
[92:17] There was so much out of them.
[92:19] So the RDA said, no, there is no backwater effect in Miami.
[92:23] In order for engineers at that point in time,
[92:26] said there was no backwater effect in Miami.
[92:28] A Miami by a low low low.
[92:31] There was an animal discussion in this very very right here.
[92:35] Well, that was it.
[92:36] It was false.
[92:38] It was this way.
[92:39] Maybe they didn't remember that they had all these studies.
[92:42] And the third is important.
[92:43] Maybe they didn't remember all of them.
[92:45] And the third is important.
[92:47] Maybe they didn't remember that.
[92:48] It's not about to show you.
[92:49] But a lot of the short of it is.
[92:51] It was there.
[92:52] It was a mistake.
[92:53] You were.
[92:54] You were.
[93:00] to believe there was no back for effective factors
[93:04] flooding in Miami in 1986,
[93:06] but it was absolutely false.
[93:09] So, we did end at this time out
[93:13] for 1992, or only experiences of A gas,
[93:16] GERDA's S, B, N, F, F, F,
[93:19] I started the fight.
[93:20] I was here at attorney, the city of Miami was attorney,
[93:23] and those initial files.
[93:25] Then it got to be much more special.
[93:29] It got to be where they were going to be
[93:32] platings at the end of the violent work.
[93:35] I have a state litigated.
[93:37] I am not an inferred practitioner.
[93:40] The federal manager right now is already finishing.
[93:42] Practitioning.
[93:43] I don't know the rules of regulations.
[93:46] The case will have a habit of it.
[93:48] So, that's when the first high or the city first higher,
[93:52] it can solve it to the attorney.
[93:55] From these cities, it was first a guy named Jim and the CEO
[93:59] and Carlos, GERDA's or GERDA's.
[94:02] Then we can almost come back out to the correct answer.
[94:05] It was the first moment.
[94:06] Very good courage.
[94:07] Charging.
[94:08] Perfect.
[94:09] Charging.
[94:10] That's why they got involved.
[94:12] And it was a bit of this touch time.
[94:14] These variances, two wrong attempts.
[94:17] This was GERDA, bringing to first, saying,
[94:20] we want to raise the lake damage.
[94:22] We do that with that.
[94:24] We have to defend those.
[94:27] That's a good.
[94:28] And we've fought him off for a long, long time.
[94:31] Man, did we stop fighting him off?
[94:33] When the political pressure,
[94:35] all day, day, day, day, day, day, day, day, day, day, day, day.
[94:37] So, litigation, we've actually had.
[94:40] That rental was in 1994.
[94:43] And I can call that GERDA one if you want.
[94:47] House now was 2001.
[94:50] That's GERDA two if you want.
[94:52] And then the city of Miami.
[94:54] Because you guys didn't give me the commitment that you would help me with 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
[95:01] And then the city of Miami.
[95:03] Because you guys didn't give me the commitment that you would help me with 300,000,000,000.
[95:10] That's for the expert expenses.
[95:16] I gave you the honor that you would like to do that.
[95:21] I'm being the name of the GERDA today.
[95:24] I'm sort of the name of the point.
[95:26] And where are we?
[95:27] Basically where we were back in Miami.
[95:30] Now, we're going to literally to have a report if you possibly be in.
[95:34] GERDA today is a extremely important role of public.
[95:39] They spend a lot of money.
[95:41] They've got a lot of power.
[95:43] They don't want to give the point where there's a actual scientific conclusion,
[95:48] based on the fact of this case.
[95:50] Because they know they're all.
[95:51] They know they're all since 1930s.
[95:53] Behind course the words, I can guarantee you they know they're all today.
[95:57] So all they're doing.
[96:00] the lighting, pushing, resisting, minimizing. That's what they're doing. I am an amp. I am
[96:08] passion. That's what they're doing. There's no other way to get it done. They know when they're
[96:14] working. They know behind closed doors and there's a significant background in that, which is
[96:19] they have a constant button that is occurring in my area because of the operation and that's
[96:24] full of data. The current lawsuit involves about $450 of the 50 main plaintiffs. The damages are
[96:33] in the neighborhood of $50 million. Prejudgment interest, attorney fees, and expert fees. You probably
[96:40] double that to about $109. We're significantly into the process. We have a significant amount of time
[96:49] and effort going forward. It's not foreseeable. And it wants something correct. It wants something
[96:55] like this and all the pressure and all the change to start happening. The test can, you
[97:01] can't be resolved in the next year or two and they will still be a process. That's a contingent fee
[97:08] case. So I made the statement and the informal first meeting that I've not been paid for in the litigation.
[97:16] And I think I said for the litigation on that contract. I have not been paid $1,000 for
[97:25] the 2007 litigation and started in 2008. Nor I have been playing just to retell it down. It's
[97:33] a contingent fee case. I get paid when they were at my command. I have been paid because in July of 2012
[97:42] we started talking about these variances and amendments, relicacy, saying that it was recognized
[97:49] at that point of time, I had already been involved in 19 years. I play in thousands of hours. I knew a lot
[97:57] of the outcomes. And so the city thought the ability to have a main call to have a consultant to the city.
[98:04] I have no relationship with DWT. I'm not going to do this right now. I'm 100% in line with them.
[98:13] I support what they do. They don't pay me on the pay down. They're at seven in the state. They're
[98:19] going to be using third-point forward. I don't have an consultant giving support, giving information,
[98:25] giving knowledge, giving context to what's being argued. Giving a ton of historical data,
[98:32] historical documents, documents, and formal labor. You can show a historical document to
[98:37] support your position. You are miles ahead of you just saying this is what we play.
[98:43] And you've been able to do that over and over and over and over as you sit. So that part of variance,
[98:50] you can flood the flood, every flood is different. It's not like we can say every time you flood
[98:55] two feet of hope is passed by the dam, six feet of hope is passed by the dam, two inches of
[99:00] It was called by a dam, it's all different.
[99:03] But you had significant floods in 87 to my knowledge,
[99:07] and in my lifetime, I followed it.
[99:09] 86, 93, 94, 95, 2007, 2019.
[99:15] The bad water effect being the dam caused flooding,
[99:19] the flooding would not have occurred,
[99:21] but for a year or a year, but for that school,
[99:23] a dam, a program, but is in the name of it, a two to six feet.
[99:28] So if you were only flooded to the six feet on any given flood,
[99:32] you may not have flooded all other ones.
[99:35] Or you may have been in some natural flood,
[99:38] and you would have flooded the six inches or a flood
[99:41] and stayed in one of the five feet down red tag in January,
[99:46] so just because there's natural flooding is not an answer to the question.
[99:52] Now, I want to touch on something right now,
[99:54] which is a two to the day when the whole time served an outlet.
[99:57] Has anybody heard that the backwater effect in my amide?
[100:01] Is two inches or 22 feet?
[100:05] Has anybody heard that position taken?
[100:07] And we'll go.
[100:09] I'd like to hear that.
[100:10] As it is, and that is this country when misrepresenting
[100:14] not focusing on the issue that we are talking about.
[100:18] You've ever heard that backwater effect in my amide?
[100:21] Is two times of old life or two inches?
[100:24] You know that person is intentionally trying to misrepresent the situation
[100:29] or they're ignorant as the ultimate actual situation.
[100:35] As the actual situation is more in the nature of two feet to six feet
[100:40] on any of these significant problems.
[100:43] We've got multiple studies to say it by others.
[100:48] We've got multiple studies to say it by our people.
[100:52] And we've got multiple court findings, such as why not?
[100:55] I recognize it on seven.
[100:57] And acknowledge it.
[100:59] It is much.
[101:00] Now you think why?
[101:02] It is much under the current criteria.
[101:05] It should be about seven.
[101:06] You think by recall that earlier I said it was about seven to seven.
[101:12] That's because there's sedimentation that flows down the river
[101:17] when it's fast and suspension, when it hits the lake.
[101:21] Slow down, drops out the sediment, impacts the bed of the river,
[101:27] causes and impact on the backwater effect.
[101:30] Causes it to accelerate and increases my amin' area.
[101:34] You also have a situation where that plug water is over the banks.
[101:40] That suspension, that sediment is still suspension over the banks.
[101:45] When it drops down, slow down, drops out the bank loans are raising up.
[101:50] When you get down straight, you just go down straight.
[101:53] That causes the lake itself as the lake and farther upstream, causes the bank water.
[102:00] that's impacted, or that occurs in the United States.
[102:05] Now I have zero ID, and we're going to be at 7.20 at this point.
[102:11] I've got great slides, I've got great detailed information.
[102:16] But I'm not sure you want to go there.
[102:18] I'd love to go over there.
[102:20] I've also been going to come back and put more of the ID on the phone.
[102:24] But to get to this video, you should really put that on into the slide.
[102:29] The primary amount of money can use benefits on the re-likes in the same way
[102:34] with the per capita per capita.
[102:38] It's a very specialized practice.
[102:41] Herb is in Washington, D.C.
[102:45] If you're given the cream on the prop, D.W.T.D.
[102:48] gave us strength to make it as literally as many as it gives.
[102:51] And they have given you the cowlac difference.
[102:55] It's a lot of money at the end of the day.
[102:58] Are there alternatives on how you can still move forward
[103:02] at a stronghold of these, you possibly can.
[103:04] That would cost me as much money.
[103:06] It's not complete a second.
[103:08] But my guess is if you approach D.W.T.D.D.D.D.D.D.D.D.D,
[103:11] with that issue, you probably could get somewhere.
[103:14] But if it is critical, it's a pressure of the opportunity
[103:21] to just through the re-likes in the process.
[103:24] And that's not...
[103:25] and you can't not do it now.
[103:27] It's not even five years from now, we should do it.
[103:30] You don't have that opportunity.
[103:32] This new license is going to give you a place in 2025.
[103:37] And it's going to be a third year of license,
[103:39] and supporting your license, and so on.
[103:42] Those are going to be rules for that period of time.
[103:45] You have to amend this power right now,
[103:47] to particularly have association with the trials,
[103:50] to be able to create a situation
[103:53] for a major year of the A1 to have an obtainable
[103:56] and want to make it to you.
[103:57] Once or all these times,
[103:59] I'm guessing all of us are a business or a business.
[104:04] You have pressure, you have leverage, you have power.
[104:07] You have done it to you.
[104:09] I'm going to support you,
[104:14] and I'm going to start going into my slides.
[104:17] If you can't do it to the honest community,
[104:21] or you have another half hour of this,
[104:23] with four feet on the ball,
[104:25] you're going to come back to the next one.
[104:27] I mean, you can get to the point when I'm just being over the head
[104:30] with the same thing trying to out.
[104:32] There's a lot more information that you're going to run in,
[104:35] but you need to know about it,
[104:38] and why you need it.
[104:39] Now, we'll have to come back.
[104:47] What's going to be great?
[104:51] Good job.
[104:52] So now we're going to move on six,
[104:56] the special part of the club.
[105:00] We are working through the topic off of the roads, the racing roads, and now we have the
[105:10] other kind of conversation with the poorest folks about sharing information that we have.
[105:15] And I wish there was always, there's that he was there before.
[105:19] I was there before.
[105:21] And then I do want to talk to Chris Lee.
[105:29] And I think I've been working about this well property through OE.
[105:32] It was submitted today.
[105:37] The total expenditure that the city will be out is very minimal because most of our costs will be in kind
[105:50] of what we can do here.
[105:52] The total project crosses 774,000 dollars in change.
[105:56] It encompasses 12 properties.
[106:00] There's residential, all along the Elstreet, simple on the two properties on central,
[106:13] the Elstreet, one in the northeast that has been on the books for a long time.
[106:19] The Thunderbird Theater, Big Data, and Thursties.
[106:23] That's it.
[106:26] And the Elstreet South East, by the College.
[106:33] So that will clear up a lot of that property that goes along with the Rotary Center, the Centennial Park.
[106:40] And that was submitted this afternoon to Matt.
[106:44] We got that done.
[106:45] And Tyler got the rest of the commitment to, and so we are looking at probably knowing something from FEMA within six months.
[106:56] It's not an overnight process.
[107:00] What happens once that happens, do we have any access to that property?
[107:04] Once that property, once we get the money from FEMA, and that is awarded, we do mitigation final offers to each property owner.
[107:13] I talked to everyone of them today because I wanted to make sure before we submitted it that they still wanted to participate.
[107:19] Because it is a voluntary participation.
[107:22] When it comes right down to it, we'll tell them, here's how much you will get for your property.
[107:27] They got flood insurance in 2019 that is deducted from the Fair Market Value.
[107:32] Fair Market Value is what they pay taxes on to the assessors.
[107:36] Once that is that and the city purchases that property, it has to remain in open space in perpetuity.
[107:45] It can never be used for anything else.
[107:47] The only thing that we got permission from FEMA to do was the property out in the Northeast.
[107:54] We're a charge storage court and all that is.
[107:56] We have the Disca gone.
[108:00] We had to get permission from FEMA to allow that to be happened because you can't go fence is on it
[108:06] Feel anything you can do is build a
[108:09] parking part on it
[108:16] This is the usual
[108:21] Crown is another
[108:24] Residential
[108:26] Yeah, she can do green space and we did we did the the disc golf out there and different things some of the things if there's any
[108:40] Going to be anything that is above a
[108:44] The flood with we grab a green stuff then you have to get permission from FEMA to do that
[108:50] I know a lot of people wanted to do a well a door park
[108:52] But you have to have a fence in a hedge and you can't do that in a flood area
[108:58] But that will remain there will be deed restrictions on that the city can never ever ever
[109:05] sell it
[109:06] leased or
[109:09] Do anything with it has to remain in the city's hands as open space. That's what FEMA calls it in perpetuity
[109:16] But so thirsty and big daddy's there's on those sides of our parking lot
[109:20] So we could easily make that into a parking space versus your tournaments. You can do
[109:26] You could even put bathrooms there as long as they can be moved and they're portable
[109:33] Like we have the fair you could put the the trailers on there as long as they're movable
[109:40] You know if a flood come you had to be able to move them otherwise you can't have any
[109:46] Permit bathrooms or anything like that there but yeah, we can make that parking
[109:51] parking
[109:52] That's that was parking. Yes
[109:56] And that's phase one of the the
[110:00] The properties that were flooded these are all red tag except for one
[110:06] And it was I don't even want to go into that one that is one that has had it has a large amount of claims against it FEMA wants it
[110:17] FEMA wants it. I'm willing to put it on there. That's phase one. There was a hundred and
[110:23] 29 total properties that are now in the special flood
[110:28] Hazard area
[110:30] That need to go away
[110:32] But FEMA didn't have the money mat that you talked with earlier the reason we got these 12 on there is he found a
[110:39] hundred six hundred and seventy five thousand dollars
[110:44] Federal share that he earmarked for the city of Miami so we worked
[110:49] It worked and that's why the Federal share of this project is five hundred and
[110:56] 98 thousand I think I've looked at two numbers today
[111:00] But the total project is 774,000 in change.
[111:03] How many bases are there?
[111:08] That depends on how much money, unfortunately.
[111:11] Base lock with the 2019 flood.
[111:14] We've targeted two bases in these, it's really addressing properties that the majority
[111:22] of them were red tagged in 2007 that were overturned and then flooded again in 2019, and we
[111:31] were red tagged on then, so that's been the focus is taking care of the properties
[111:36] that are repetitive flooding that have been red tagged, that are going to flood again.
[111:46] As far as phases, basically we got the last of the money out of the disaster from 2019.
[111:54] We're going to have to have another disaster before there's any more money.
[111:58] I'm sorry, that's just how it works.
[112:00] There's a disaster in the government releases funds, and I do have all of the rest of the
[112:10] properties that are there.
[112:13] They have been sent to the Department of Commerce because they have some extra money, but 80% of
[112:20] that money has to go to Muscogee and it helps me, where there's only 20% left.
[112:32] But they contacted us to see if we had any properties, and I said, I'll send y'all
[112:37] to them.
[112:38] So it's in their hands, it's kind of like, I'll see what they say.
[112:41] We could have more mitigation in another area from a different fund, possibly, but I'm not holding
[112:49] my breath on it.
[114:01] Like that one.
[114:02] Parker?
[114:07] Parker?
[114:09] Amanda?
[114:10] I.
[114:11] Please.
[114:12] All right.
[114:13] We'll learn to make her.
[114:14] Sit.
[114:15] All right.
[114:16] Thank you.
[114:17] Thank you.
[114:18] Thank you.
[114:19] Thank you.
[114:22] Thank you.