Finance transcript library / Ottawa County Finance
Ottawa County Financial Report
FY 16 - Financial Statement Audit - Embedded text
FY 16Fiscal year
Financial Statement AuditDocument category
80,020Transcript characters
text layerExtraction method
Audit Review Notes
- This is an Ottawa County Financial Statement Audit source document. Compare appropriations, estimated revenue, cash surplus, ad valorem, sinking fund, and fund-balance lines against the SAI/audit reports and the county tax roll.
- For financial statements, compare audit findings, cash balances, receivables/payables, compliance notes, and prior-year adjustments against the Estimate of Needs documents.
Money Trail Terms Found
total expenditures: 2 general fund: 10 sales tax: 28 appropriation: 14 ad valorem: 4 debt: 5 grant: 10 jail: 11 sheriff: 28 audit: 76
Largest Dollar Amounts Detected
- $9,495,220
- $9,450,729
- $6,878,269
- $6,499,713
- $6,254,729
- $4,879,659
- $4,560,934
- $4,533,552
- $4,338,815
- $3,584,598
- $3,557,362
- $3,359,248
Automated extraction can miss or misread numbers, especially in OCR. Verify against the PDF before relying on a figure.
SEO Text Transcript
ottawa
county
Financial Report
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
AND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
This publication, issued by the Oklahoma State Auditor and Inspector’s Office as authorized by 19 O.S. § 171, has not
been printed, but is available on the agency’s website (www.sai.ok.gov) and in the Oklahoma Department of Libraries
Publications Clearinghouse Digital Prairie Collection (http://digitalprairie.ok.gov/cdm/search/collection/audits/)
pursuant to 65 O.S. § 3-114.
March 21, 2022
TO THE CITIZENS OF
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
Transmitted herewith is the audit of Ottawa County, Oklahoma for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.
The audit was conducted in accordance with 19 O.S. § 171.
A report of this type can be critical in nature. Failure to report commendable features in the accounting
and operating procedures of the entity should not be interpreted to mean that they do not exist.
The goal of the State Auditor and Inspector is to promote accountability and fiscal integrity in state and
local government. Maintaining our independence as we provide this service to the taxpayers of
Oklahoma is of utmost importance.
We wish to take this opportunity to express our appreciation for the assistance and cooperation extended
to our office during our engagement.
This report is a public document pursuant to the Oklahoma Open Records Act (51 O.S. § 24A.1 et seq.)
and shall be open to any person for inspection and copying.
Sincerely,
CINDY BYRD, CPA
OKLAHOMA STATE AUDITOR & INSPECTOR
OTTAWA COUNTY OFFICIALS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
Board of County Commissioners
District 1 – John Clark
District 2 – Gary Wyrick
District 3 – Russell Earls
County Assessor
Becky Smith
County Clerk
Reba Sill
County Sheriff
Derek Derwin
County Treasurer
Kathy Bowling
Court Clerk
Cassie Key
District Attorney
Kenny Wright
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FINANCIAL SECTION
Report of State Auditor and Inspector .......................................................................................................... 1
Financial Statement:
Statement of Receipts, Disbursements, and Changes in Cash Balances—Regulatory Basis (with
Combining Information)......................................................................................................................... 4
Notes to the Financial Statement ............................................................................................................ 5
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Comparative Schedule of Expenditures—Budget and Actual—Budgetary Basis—General Fund...... 13
Comparative Schedule of Expenditures—Budget and Actual—Budgetary Basis—Health Fund........ 14
Note to Supplementary Information ..................................................................................................... 15
INTERNAL CONTROL AND COMPLIANCE SECTION
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters
Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance With
Government Auditing Standards ................................................................................................................. 16
Schedule of Findings and Responses .......................................................................................................... 18
i
FINANCIAL SECTION
Independent Auditor’s Report
TO THE OFFICERS OF
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
Report on the Financial Statement
We have audited the combined total—all county funds on the accompanying regulatory basis Statement
of Receipts, Disbursements, and Changes in Cash Balances of Ottawa County, Oklahoma, as of and for
the year ended June 30, 2016, and the related notes to the financial statement, which collectively
comprise the County’s basic financial statement as listed in the table of contents.
Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statement
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of this financial statement in
accordance with the regulatory basis of accounting described in Note 1, and for determining that the
regulatory basis of accounting is an acceptable basis for the preparation of the financial statement in the
circumstances. Management is also responsible for the design, implementation, and maintenance of
internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement based on our audit. We conducted
our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and
the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement is free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statement. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statement, whether due to fraud or error.
In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s
preparation and fair presentation of the financial statement in order to design audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness
of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant
accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
financial statement.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for
our audit opinion.
Basis for Adverse Opinion on U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
As described in Note 1, the financial statement is prepared by Ottawa County using accounting practices
prescribed or permitted by Oklahoma state law, which is a basis of accounting other than accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The effects on the financial statement of the
variances between the regulatory basis of accounting described in Note 1 and accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, although not reasonably determinable, are presumed to
be material.
Adverse Opinion on U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
In our opinion, because of the significance of the matter discussed in the “Basis for Adverse Opinion on
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” paragraph, the financial statement referred to above does
not present fairly, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America, the financial position of Ottawa County as of June 30, 2016, or changes in financial position for
the year then ended.
Unmodified Opinion on Regulatory Basis of Accounting
In our opinion, the financial statement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the
combined total of receipts, disbursements, and changes in cash balances for all county funds of Ottawa
County, for the year ended June 30, 2016, in accordance with the basis of accounting described in Note 1.
Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in Note 3F to the financial statement, the June 30, 2015 financial statement has been restated
to correct a misstatement. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
Other Matters
Supplementary Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the combined total of all county funds
on the financial statement. The supplementary information, as listed in the table of contents, is presented
for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statement.
The supplementary information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates
directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statement. Such
information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statement
and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the
underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statement or to the financial statement
itself, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States of America. In our opinion, the supplementary information is fairly stated, in all material
respects, in relation to the financial statement.
Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated March 8, 2022,
on our consideration of Ottawa County’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its
compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters.
The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial
reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness
of the County’s internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part
2
of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering Ottawa County’s
internal control over financial reporting and compliance.
CINDY BYRD, CPA
OKLAHOMA STATE AUDITOR & INSPECTOR
March 8, 2022
3
REGULATORY BASIS FINANCIAL STATEMENT
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS, DISBURSEMENTS, AND
CHANGES IN CASH BALANCES—REGULATORY BASIS
(WITH COMBINING INFORMATION)
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
Beginning Ending
Cash Balances Receipts Transfers Transfers Cash Balances
July 1, 2015 Apportioned In Out Disbursements June 30, 2016
Combining Information:
County General Fund $ 1,154,594 $ 3,584,598 $ - $ - $ 3,359,248 $ 1,379,944
County Sales Tax 1,888 - - - 1,888 -
County Health 479,615 227,658 - - 314,482 392,791
Highway 1,402,134 2,216,627 - - 2,200,803 1,417,958
Highway 1/2 Cent Sales Tax 1,236,142 1,182,574 304,475 - 1,434,233 1,288,958
Courthouse Building Authority Sales Tax 502,461 591,192 - - 534,347 559,306
MIDA Rawlins Sinking 29,755 14,736 - - 16,950 27,541
Firefighters Sales Tax 330,426 236,800 2,235 - 273,848 295,613
Board of Prisoners 196,339 189,613 - - 256,445 129,507
County Bridge and Road Improvement Fund 376,435 181,433 - 15,000 153,100 389,768
Resale 199,326 240,630 - - 172,186 267,770
Local Emergency Planning Committee 1,000 1,000 - - - 2,000
Emergency Management Performace Grant 15,000 15,001 - - 18,750 11,251
Sheriff Service Fee 203,269 421,113 - - 432,368 192,014
Sheriff Bond Fee 33,170 22,472 - - 48,176 7,466
Sheriff Commissary 42,692 95,247 - - 80,056 57,883
County Clerk Lien Fee 13,601 10,965 - - 15,008 9,558
County Clerk Preservation Fund 16,804 25,807 - - 18,740 23,871
County Treasurer Mortgage Certification Fee 1,147 4,120 - - 4,342 925
Littering Reward Fund 658 200 - - - 858
County Assessor Revolving 16,013 1,593 - - 4,838 12,768
Paradise Point 10 - - 10 - -
Firefighters Miami 2,225 - - 2,225 - -
Tulsa Teachers Credit Union 25 - - - - 25
Safe Room Project - 187,350 - - 155,412 31,938
Combined Total - All County Funds, as Restated $ 6,254,729 $ 9,450,729 $ 306,710 $ 17,235 $ 9,495,220 $ 6,499,713
The notes to the financial statement are an integral part of this statement.
4
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
A. Reporting Entity
Ottawa County is a subdivision of the State of Oklahoma created by the Oklahoma Constitution
and regulated by Oklahoma Statutes.
The accompanying financial statement presents the receipts, disbursements, and changes in cash
balances of the total of all funds under the control of the primary government. The general fund is
the county’s general operating fund, accounting for all financial resources except those required to
be accounted for in another fund, where its use is restricted for a specified purpose. Other funds
established by statute and under the control of the primary government are also presented.
The County Treasurer collects and remits material amounts of intergovernmental revenues and ad
valorem tax revenue for other budgetary entities, including emergency medical districts, school
districts, and cities and towns. The cash receipts and disbursements attributable to those other
entities do not appear in funds on the County’s financial statement; those funds play no part in the
County’s operations. Any trust or agency funds maintained by the County are not included in this
presentation.
B. Fund Accounting
The County uses funds to report on receipts, disbursements, and changes in cash balances. Fund
accounting is designed to demonstrate legal compliance and to aid financial management by
segregating transactions related to certain government functions or activities.
Following are descriptions of the county funds included as combining information within the
financial statement:
County General Fund – accounts for the general operations of the government with revenues
from ad valorem taxes, officer's fees, sales tax, interest earnings, and miscellaneous collections
of the County.
County Sales Tax – accounts for revenues from interest earnings. This is the residual balance
of sales tax collected for the construction of the County jail. Disbursements are for capital
improvements to the jail.
County Health – accounts for ad valorem taxes, miscellaneous fees charged by the County
Health department, and state and federal funds. Disbursements are for the operation of the
County Health Department.
Highway – account for revenues from state-imposed fuel taxes. Disbursements are for the
maintenance and construction of county roads and bridges.
5
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
Highway ½ Cent Sales Tax – accounts for the collection of sales tax revenue and the
disbursement of funds are for the construction of county roads and bridges as restricted by the
sales tax ballot.
Courthouse Building Authority Sales Tax – accounts for the collection of sales tax revenue and
the disbursement of funds are for the County Courthouse facilities and to pay the principal and
interest on indebtedness on behalf of the County by the Ottawa County Governmental Building
Authority as restricted by the sales tax ballot.
MIDA Rawlins Sinking – accounts for revenues from ad valorem taxes and interest earnings.
Disbursements are for the payment of principal and interest on bonds and judgments against
the County.
Firefighters Sales Tax – accounts for the collection of sales tax revenue and disbursement of
funds are for general operation, maintenance, training, and construction of new fire department
buildings or improvements to existing fire department buildings as restricted by the sales tax
ballot.
Board of Prisoners – accounts for revenues from fees charged for boarding prisoners of non-
county entities in the county jail. Disbursements are for feeding and housing inmates of the
county jail as restricted by state statute
County Bridge and Road Improvement Fund – accounts for state money received for
construction and/or improvement of bridges within the County.
Resale – accounts for the receipt and disposition of interest and penalties on delinquent ad
valorem taxes as restricted by state statute.
Local Emergency Planning Committee – accounts for the receipt of funds from state and local
governments and disbursed as restricted by the grant agreements.
Emergency Management Performance Grant – accounts for the receipt of federal funds to be
disbursed as restricted by the grant agreement.
Sheriff Service Fee – accounts for the collection and disbursement of sheriff process service
fees and Court Clerk fees as restricted by state statute.
Sheriff Bond Fee – revenues are from a fee charged to all persons who post a surety bond and
are subsequently incarcerated. Disbursements are for any legal expense of the jail.
Sheriff Commissary – accounts for monies received from commissary sales in the county jail.
Disbursements are for jail operations as defined by state statute.
6
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
County Clerk Lien Fee – accounts for lien collections and disbursements as restricted by state
statute.
County Clerk Preservation Fund – accounts for fees collected for instruments filed with the
County Clerk's office as restricted by state statute to be used for preservation of records.
County Treasurer Mortgage Certification Fee – accounts for the collection of fees by the
Treasurer for mortgage tax certificates and the disbursement of the funds as restricted by state
statute.
Littering Reward Fund – accounts for the revenue received from the Court Clerk for littering
fines. Disbursement of funds as restricted by Title 22 O.S. § 1334.
County Assessor Revolving – accounts for the collection of fees for copies restricted by state
statute.
Paradise Point – accounts for revenue restrict for the use of the Paradise Point Fire Department.
Firefighters Miami – accounts for donations to pay for t-shirts for the Miami Fire Department
only.
Tulsa Teachers Credit Union – accounts for County funds on deposit with the Tulsa Teachers
Credit Union (TTCU) in order for the Sheriff to obtain a TTCU credit card for travel purposes.
Safe Room Project – accounts for federal grant revenues and expenditures for the Safe Room
Reimbursement Project.
C. Basis of Accounting
The financial statement is prepared on a basis of accounting wherein amounts are recognized when
received or disbursed. This basis of accounting differs from accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, which require revenues to be recognized when they
become available and measurable or when they are earned, and expenditures or expenses to be
recognized when the related liabilities are incurred. This regulatory basis financial presentation is
not a comprehensive measure of economic condition or changes therein.
Title 19 O.S. § 171 specifies the format and presentation for Oklahoma counties to present their
financial statement in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (U.S. GAAP) or on a regulatory basis. The County has elected to present their
financial statement on a regulatory basis in conformity with Title 19 O.S. § 171. County
governments (primary only) are required to present their financial statements on a fund basis format
with, at a minimum, the general fund and all other county funds, which represent ten percent or
greater of total county revenue with all other funds included in the audit presented in the aggregate
in a combining statement. However, the County has elected to present all funds included in the
7
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
audit in the Statement of Receipts, Disbursements, and Changes in Cash Balances—Regulatory
Basis.
D. Budget
Under current Oklahoma Statutes, a general fund and a county health department fund are the only
funds required to adopt a formal budget. On or before the first Monday in July of each year, each
officer or department head submits an estimate of needs to the governing body. The budget is
approved for the respective fund by office, or department and object. The County Board of
Commissioners may approve changes of appropriations within the fund by office or department
and object. To increase or decrease the budget by fund requires approval by the County Excise
Board.
E. Cash and Investments
For the purposes of financial reporting, “Ending Cash Balances, June 30” includes cash and cash
equivalents and investments as allowed by statutes. The County pools the cash of its various funds
in maintaining its bank accounts. However, cash applicable to a particular fund is readily
identifiable on the County’s books. The balance in the pooled cash accounts is available to meet
current operating requirements.
State statutes require financial institutions with which the County maintains funds to deposit
collateral securities to secure the County’s deposits. The amount of collateral securities to be
pledged is established by the County Treasurer; this amount must be at least the amount of the
deposit to be secured, less the amount insured (by, for example, the FDIC).
The County Treasurer has been authorized by the County’s governing board to make investments.
Allowable investments are outlined in statutes 62 O.S. § 348.1 and § 348.3.
All investments must be backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government, the
Oklahoma State Government, fully collateralized, or fully insured. All investments as classified by
state statute are nonnegotiable certificates of deposit. Nonnegotiable certificates of deposit are not
subject to interest rate risk or credit risk.
2. Ad Valorem Tax
The County's property tax is levied each October 1 on the assessed value listed as of January 1 of
the same year for all real and personal property located in the County, except certain exempt
property. Assessed values are established by the County Assessor within the prescribed guidelines
established by the Oklahoma Tax Commission and the State Equalization Board. Title 68 O.S. §
2820.A. states, ". . . Each assessor shall thereafter maintain an active and systematic program of
visual inspection on a continuous basis and shall establish an inspection schedule which will result
8
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
in the individual visual inspection of all taxable property within the county at least once each four
(4) years."
Taxes are due on November 1 following the levy date, although they may be paid in two equal
installments. If the first half is paid prior to January 1, the second half is not delinquent until April
1. The County Treasurer, according to the law, shall give notice of delinquent taxes and special
assessments by publication once a week for two consecutive weeks at any time after April 1, but
prior to the end of September following the year the taxes were first due and payable. Unpaid real
property taxes become a lien upon said property after the treasurer has perfected the lien by public
notice.
Unpaid delinquent personal property taxes are usually published in May. If the taxes are not paid
within 30 days from publication, they shall be placed on the personal tax lien docket.
3. Other Information
A. Pension Plan
Plan Description. The County contributes to the Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement Plan (the
Plan), a cost-sharing, multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan administered by the
Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS). Benefit provisions are established and
amended by the Oklahoma Legislature. The Plan provides retirement, disability, and death benefits
to Plan members and beneficiaries. Title 74, Sections 901 through 943, as amended, establishes
the provisions of the Plan. OPERS issues a publicly available financial report that includes
financial statements and supplementary information. That report may be obtained by writing
OPERS, P.O. Box 53007, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105 or by calling 1-800-733-9008.
Funding Policy. The contribution rates for each member category are established by the Oklahoma
Legislature and are based on an actuarial calculation which is performed to determine the adequacy
of contribution rates.
B. Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB)
In addition to the pension benefits described in the Pension Plan note, OPERS provides post-
retirement health care benefits of up to $105 each for retirees who are members of an eligible group
plan. These benefits are funded on a pay-as-you-go basis as part of the overall retirement benefit.
OPEB expenditure and participant information is available for the state as a whole; however,
information specific to the County is not available nor can it be reasonably estimated.
C. Contingent Liabilities
Amounts received or receivable from grantor agencies are subject to audit and adjustment by
grantor agencies, primarily the federal government. Any disallowed claims, including amounts
9
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
already collected, may constitute a liability of the applicable fund. The amount, if any, of
expenditures which may be disallowed by the grantor cannot be determined at this time; although,
the County expects such amounts, if any, to be immaterial.
As of the end of the fiscal year, there were no claims or judgments that would have a material
adverse effect on the financial condition of the County; however, the outcome of any lawsuit would
not be determinable.
D. Long Term Obligations
1. General Obligation Bonds
The government issues general obligation bonds to provide funds for the acquisition and
construction of major capital facilities. Debt service on the bonds will be paid from ad
valorem taxes levied and assessed on behalf of the issuer and deposited to the Sinking
Fund.
County General Obligation Limited Tax Bonds of 1987 – bonds in the amount of $400,000
were issued July 1, 1987, to provide funds for the purpose of securing and developing
industry within Ottawa County.
General obligation bonds are direct obligations and pledge the full faith and credit of the
government. These bonds are required to be fully paid within 25 years from the date of
issue. General obligation bonds currently outstanding are as follows:
Interest Original
Purpose
Rate Amount
Ottawa County General
6.00% $400,000
Obligation Bonds of 1987
Amount
Beginning Ending Due Within
Balance Additions Reductions Balance One Year
$40,000 $ - 0- $15,000 $25,000 $15,000
During fiscal year 2016, payments included $15,000 for principal and $1,950 for interest.
10
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
Annual debt service requirements to maturity for general obligation bonds, including
interest of $1,350, are as follows:
Fiscal Year Ending
Principal Interest Total
June 30, 2016
2017 $15,000 $1,050 $16,050
2018 10,000 300 10,300
Total $25,000 $1,350 $27,100
E. Sales Tax
On September 15, 1992, Ottawa County voters approved a permanent one-half cent sales tax. The
purpose of the tax is the construction, maintenance, and operation of a modern jail facility and
operation of the Ottawa County Sheriff’s Department. These funds are accounted for in the County
General Fund.
On November 3, 1998, Ottawa County voters approved a permanent one-half cent sales tax
effective January 1, 1999, for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the county road and
bridge system of Ottawa County, Oklahoma. These funds are accounted for in the Highway ½ Cent
Sales Tax fund.
On November 18, 2003, Ottawa County voters approved a one-tenth of one percent (1/10 of 1%)
county sales tax in perpetuity and effective on or after April 1, 2004, which is to be used to fund
the fire departments in Ottawa County, for purposes including, but not limited to equipment,
general operations, maintenance, training and the construction of new fire department buildings or
improvements to existing fire department buildings. These funds are accounted for in the
Firefighters Sales Tax fund.
On December 13, 2005, Ottawa County voters approved a one-fourth of one percent (1/4 of 1%)
county sales tax for the sole purpose to pay for acquiring, constructing, equipping, repairing,
renovating, operating, and maintaining County Courthouse facilities for Ottawa County,
Oklahoma; and to pay the principal and interest on indebtedness incurred on behalf of the County
by the Ottawa County Governmental Building Authority for such purposes. The effective date of
this tax is April 1, 2006 and shall expire and cease to be collected when sufficient funds have been
collected from said levy to retire such indebtedness or on April 1, 2036, whichever shall be earlier.
These funds are accounted for in the Courthouse Building Authority Sales Tax fund.
F. Interfund Transfers
During the fiscal year, the County made the following transfers between cash funds:
$304,475 was transferred from the Emergency and Transportation Revolving fund (a trust
and agency fund) to the Highway ½ Cent Sales Tax fund for the purpose of funding county
road and bridge projects.
11
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
$15,000 was transferred from the County Bridge and Road Improvement Fund to the
Emergency and Transportation Revolving fund (a trust and agency fund) to repay a loan
from CED for funding of road and bridge projects.
$2,225 was transferred from the Firefighters Miami fund to the Firefighters Sales Tax fund
to close out the Firefighters Miami fund.
$10 was transferred from the Paradise Point fund to the Firefighters Sales Tax fund to close
out the Paradise Point fund.
G. Restatement of Fund Balance
During the fiscal year, the County had a reclassification of funds. In the prior year, the County
receipted Emergency and Transportation Revolving trust and agency revenues the Highway ½ Cent
Sales Tax fund in error. Emergency and Transportation Revolving revenue should have been
receipted into a trust and Agency fund. Additionally, the County reclassified the Child Abuse
Prevention fund to a trust and agency fund as these are funds of the District Attorney and not the
County.
Prior year ending balance, as reported $6,878,269
Funds reclassified as Trust and Agency Funds:
Emergency and Transportation Revolving revenue reclassified
from County revenues to Trust and Agency revenues 616,238
Child Abuse Prevention 7,302
Prior year ending balance, as restated $6,254,729
H. Special Items
Investigative Audit
The State Auditor and Inspector’s Office conducted a special investigative audit of the Ottawa
County Sheriff’s Office for the period of July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2019. It was noted that
the overall fiscal management of the Sheriff’s Department contributed to the need for the
Sheriff to receive supplemental appropriations of almost $435,000 between July 1, 2016 and
June 30, 2019. These findings will not have a material effect on the basic financial statement
for the year ending June 30, 2016.
12
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
COMPARATIVE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES—BUDGET AND ACTUAL—
BUDGETARY BASIS—GENERAL FUND
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
General Fund
Budget Actual Variance
District Attorney $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ -
County Sheriff 1,601,843 1,598,174 3,669
County Treasurer 152,584 152,528 56
County Commissioners 78,963 78,658 305
County Commissioners O.S.U. Extension 73,173 68,988 4,185
County Clerk 327,158 324,557 2,601
Court Clerk 442,516 415,570 26,946
County Assessor 72,507 72,206 301
Revaluation of Real Property 219,329 219,328 1
General Government 1,082,689 348,357 734,332
Excise - Equalization Board 2,438 1,938 500
County Election Expense 147,096 142,111 4,985
Emergency Management 79,418 78,689 729
County Audit Budget Account 43,201 43,201 -
Cemetary 400 - 400
Free Fair Budget Account 9,500 9,057 443
Provisions for Interest on Warrants 2,000 - 2,000
Total Expenditures, Budgetary Basis $ 4,338,815 $ 3,557,362 $ 781,453
13
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
COMPARATIVE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES—BUDGET AND ACTUAL—
BUDGETARY BASIS—HEALTH FUND
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
Health Fund
Budget Actual Variance
Health and Welfare $ 661,749 $ 348,495 $ 313,254
Total Expenditures, Budgetary Basis $ 661,749 $ 348,495 $ 313,254
14
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
NOTE TO SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
1. Budgetary Schedules
The Comparative Schedules of Expenditures—Budget and Actual—Budgetary Basis for the
General Fund and the Health Fund present comparisons of the legally adopted budget with actual
data. The "actual" data, as presented in the comparison of budget and actual, will differ from the
data as presented in the Statement of Receipts, Disbursements, and Changes in Cash Balances (with
Combining Information) because of adopting certain aspects of the budgetary basis of accounting
and the adjusting of encumbrances and outstanding warrants to their related budget year.
Encumbrance accounting, under which purchase orders, contracts, and other commitments for the
expenditure of monies are recorded in order to reserve that portion of the applicable appropriation,
is employed as an extension of formal budgetary integration in these funds. At the end of the year
unencumbered appropriations lapse.
15
INTERNAL CONTROL AND COMPLIANCE SECTION
Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on
Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in
Accordance With Government Auditing Standards
TO THE OFFICERS OF
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the combined total—all funds of the
accompanying Statement of Receipts, Disbursements, and Changes in Cash Balances (with Combining
Information) of Ottawa County, Oklahoma, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2016, and the related
notes to the financial statement, which collectively comprises Ottawa County’s basic financial
statement, prepared using accounting practices prescribed or permitted by Oklahoma state law, and have
issued our report thereon dated March 8, 2022.
Our report included an adverse opinion on the financial statement because the statement is prepared
using accounting practices prescribed or permitted by Oklahoma state law, which is a basis of accounting
other than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. However, our
report also included our opinion that the financial statement does present fairly, in all material respects,
the receipts, disbursements, and changes in cash balances – regulatory basis of the County for the year
ended June 30, 2016, on the basis of accounting prescribed by Oklahoma state law, described in Note 1.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statement, we considered Ottawa County’s internal
control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate
in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statement, but not for
the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Ottawa County’s internal control.
Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of Ottawa County’s internal control.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow
management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or
detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination
of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement
of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A
significant deficiency is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe
than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph and was
not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant
deficiencies and therefore, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not
identified. We did identify certain deficiencies in internal control, described in the accompanying schedule
of findings and responses that we consider to be material weaknesses: 2016-001, 2016-006, 2016-007, and
2016-009.
Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether Ottawa County’s financial statement is free from
material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations,
contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the
determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those
provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The
results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported
under Government Auditing Standards.
We noted certain matters regarding statutory compliance that we reported to the management of Ottawa
County, which are included in Section 2 of the schedule of findings and responses contained in this report.
Ottawa County’s Response to Findings
Ottawa County’s response to the findings identified in our audit are described in the accompanying schedule
of findings and responses. Ottawa County’s response was not subjected to the auditing procedures applied
in the audit of the financial statement and, accordingly, we express no opinion on the response.
Purpose of this Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance
and the result of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal
control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with
Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly,
this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.
CINDY BYRD, CPA
OKLAHOMA STATE AUDITOR & INSPECTOR
March 8, 2022
17
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RESPONSES
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
SECTION 1—Findings related to the Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on
Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance
With Government Auditing Standards
Finding 2016-001 - Lack of County-Wide Internal Controls and Disaster Recover Plans (Repeat
Finding – 2007-003, 2008-003, 2013-001, 2014-001, 2015-001)
Condition: When assessing the county-wide internal controls, the following weaknesses were noted:
County-wide internal controls regarding Risk Assessment, Information and Communication, and
Monitoring have not been designed.
The Commissioners, County Assessor, Court Clerk, and County Sheriff have not yet designed a
Disaster Recovery Plan over information systems operating within each office.
Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to address county-
wide internal controls and to ensure that all county offices have a Disaster Recovery Plan.
Effect of Condition: Without an adequate system of county-wide internal controls, there is a greater risk
of a breakdown in control activities which could result in unrecorded transactions, undetected errors, or
misappropriation of funds. Further, the lack of a Disaster Recovery Plan could also result in the loss of data,
the unreliability of data, and increase the risk that the County may not recover from an emergency and/or
disaster in a timely manner.
Recommendation: The Oklahoma State Auditor and Inspector’s Office (OSAI) recommends that the
County design and implement a system of county-wide procedures to identify and address risks related to
financial reporting and to ensure that information is communicated effectively. OSAI also recommends that
the County design monitoring procedures to assess the quality of performance over time. These procedures
should be written policies and procedures and could be included in the County’s policies and procedures
handbook.
OSAI further recommends all officials have a formal Disaster Recovery Plan for their office in order to
maintain operations in the event of a disaster.
Management Response:
District 1 County Commissioner: Although I was not in office during this fiscal year, I will work with
the other elected officials to implement quarterly meetings to address county-wide internal controls over
Risk Assessment, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. Additionally, the Board of County
Commissioners (BOCC) will take a more active role in ensuring the County’s financial statements are
prepared in a timely manner and are accurate and free from error. Furthermore, the County is working to
ensure that all county offices have created and implemented a Disaster Recovery Plan.
18
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RESPONSES
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
District 2 County Commissioner: My tenure as an Ottawa County Commissioner started on January 1,
2021. Though I appreciate the information, I can only commit to correct any policies or practices going
forward.
Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners/District 3 County Commissioner: I will work with
the other elected officials to implement quarterly meetings to address county-wide internal controls over
Risk Assessment, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. Additionally, the BOCC will take a
more active role in ensuring the County’s financial statements are prepared in a timely manner and are
accurate and free from error. Furthermore, the County is working to ensure that all County offices have
created and implemented a Disaster Recovery Plan.
County Assessor: We are currently working on a Disaster Recovery Plan.
Court Clerk: I am in the process of developing a Disaster Recovery Plan for my office.
County Sheriff: I was not in office at this time. I am going to contact Association of County Commissioners
of Oklahoma (ACCO) and attempt to get a template for a Disaster Recovery Plan and begin working on
this.
Criteria: The United States Government Accountability Office’s Standards for Internal Control in the
Federal Government (2014 version) aided in guiding our assessments and conclusion. Although this
publication (GAO Standards) addresses controls in the federal government, this criterion can be treated as
best practices and may be applied as a framework for an internal control system for state, local, and quasi -
governmental entities.
The GAO Standards – Section 1 – Fundamental Concepts of Internal Control – OV1.01 states in part:
Definition of Internal Control
Internal control is a process effected by an entity’s oversight body, management, and other
personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be
achieved.
Additionally, GAO Standards – Section 2 – Establishing an Effective Internal Control System – OV2.04
states in part:
Components, Principles, and Attributes
Control Environment - The foundation for an internal control system. It provides the
discipline and structure to help an entity achieve its objectives.
Risk Assessment - Assesses the risks facing the entity as it seeks to achieve its objectives.
This assessment provides the basis for developing appropriate risk responses.
Information and Communication - The quality information management and personnel
communicate and use to support the internal control system.
19
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RESPONSES
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
Monitoring - Activities management establishes and operates to assess the quality of
performance over time and promptly resolve the findings of audits and other reviews.
Further, an important aspect of internal controls is the safeguarding of assets which includes adequate
Disaster Recovery Plans. Internal controls over safeguarding of assets constitute a process, affected by an
entity’s governing body, management, and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention in a county being unable to function in the event of a disaster.
According to the standards of the Information Systems Audit and Control Association (CobiT Delivery and
Support 4), information services function management should ensure that a written Disaster Recovery Plan
is documented and contains guidelines and instructions for the County to follow in the event of a disaster.
Finding 2016-006 - Inadequate Internal Controls Over the Financial Statement, Notes to the
Financial Statement, Supplemental Information, and Underlying Financial Records
Condition: The County is responsible for preparing their annual financial statement, notes to the financial
statements, and supplemental information. The County hired an independent CPA firm to prepare these
required financial documents for fiscal year 2016. However, there is no indication the fiscal year 2016
financial statement, notes to the financial statements, and supplemental information were reviewed and
approved by County officials prior to being submitted to OSAI.
Additionally, during the review and reconciliations of the financial statement and notes to the financial
statement, as initially prepared by the County, it was noted that the County’s financial statement was
materially misstated as follows:
Apportionments were overstated by $4,560,934.
Disbursements were overstated by $16,123.
Beginning fund balance was overstated by $623,538.
Ending fund balance was overstated $4,879,659.
Transfers in and transfers out were understated $303,350 and $15,000, respectively.
Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure the
County’s financial statement, notes to the financial statement, and supplemental information is prepared in
a timely manner and accurately presented.
Effect of Condition: These conditions resulted in the County’s fiscal year 2016 financial statement being
materially misstated.
Recommendation: OSAI recommends the County design and implement policies and procedures to ensure
the financial statement, notes to the financial statement, and supplemental information are prepared in a
timely manner, reviewed for accuracy and completeness, and approved by management.
20
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RESPONSES
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
Management Response:
Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners: The fiscal year 2016 financial statement
apportionments and ending balance were materially overstated due to an error in drawing down $4,533,552
federal funds. Since the funds should not have been drawn down, they should have been placed in a trust
and agency fund until the Federal government retrieved them instead of being placed in a county fund. The
other errors noted on the financial statements were due to the incorrect classification of trust and agency
funds as county funds and the incorrect reporting of error corrections. Additionally, the BOCC is working
to implement policies and procedures to ensure the accurate and timely reporting of the County's financial
statements, notes to financial statements, and supplemental information.
County Clerk: The fiscal year 2016 financial statement apportionments and ending balance were materially
overstated due to an error in drawing down $4,533,552 federal funds. Since the funds should not have been
drawn down, they should have been placed in a trust and agency fund until the Federal government retrieved
them instead of being placed in a County fund The County will implement policies and procedures to ensure
the financial statement, notes to the financial statement and supplemental information are prepared in a
timely manner, reviewed for accuracy and completeness.
County Treasurer: The fiscal year 2016 financial statement apportionments and ending balance were
materially overstated due to an error in drawing down $4,533,552 federal funds. Since the funds should
not have been drawn down, they should have been placed in a trust and agency fund until the Federal
government retrieved them instead of being placed in a County fund. Additionally, I will work with the
other elected officials to implement policies and procedures to ensure the accurate and timely reporting of
the County's financial statements, notes to financial statements, and supplemental information.
Criteria: The limitations of the auditor are described in the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants Clarified Statements on Auditing Standards AU-C § 210, which states, in part: “The concept
of an independent audit requires that the auditor's role does not involve assuming management's
responsibility for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements or assuming responsibility
for the entity's related internal control and that the auditor has a reasonable expectation of obtaining the
information necessary for the audit insofar as management is able to provide or procure it. Accordingly,
the premise is fundamental to the conduct of an independent audit.”
The County’s management is responsible for establishing internal control procedures to prevent or detect
misstatements in a timely manner. This includes preparation of the financial statements and accompanying
notes to the financial statements in accordance with applicable accounting principles. Statement on
Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 115 indicates that the County must have adequate knowledge and expertise
to apply accounting principles to the financial statements or to review financial statements prepared on their
behalf by others to ensure they are prepared in accordance with these principles. Professional audit
standards preclude the external financial statement auditor from performing any part of management’s
control activities or be a component of the internal controls over financial reporting as this would impair
their independence.
The County is required to present a financial statement for each fiscal year ended June 30. Title 19 O.S. §
171 states in part, "Unless the county elects to prepare its financial statement in accordance with Generally
21
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RESPONSES
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
Accepted Accounting Principles as prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, the
county shall present their financial statements in a regulatory basis of accounting.”
The GAO Standards – Principle 13 – Use Quality Information states:
Data Processed into Quality Information
13.05 - Management processes the obtained data into quality information that supports the
internal control system. This involves processing data into information and then evaluating
the processed information so that it is quality information. Quality information meets the
identified information requirements when relevant data from reliable sources are used.
Quality information is appropriate, current, complete, accurate, accessible, and provided
on a timely basis. Management considers these characteristics as well as the information
processing objectives in evaluating processed information and makes revisions when
necessary so that the information is quality information.
13.06 - Management processes relevant data from reliable sources into quality information
within the entity’s information system. An information system is the people, processes,
data, and technology that management organizes to obtain, communicate, or dispose of
information. Management uses the quality information to make informed decisions and
evaluate the entity’s performance in achieving key objectives and addressing risks.
Finding 2016-007 - Inadequate Segregation of Duties – County Treasurer’s Office (Repeat Finding -
2009-003, 2010-001, 2011-002, 2012-002, 2013-005, 2014-003, 2015-003)
Condition: Upon inquiry of the County Treasurer’s staff and observation and review of the County records
we noted the following:
One person can take in collections, issue receipts, perform drawer close out and reconciliation, and
prepare deposit with little or no review.
Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure adequate
segregation of duties.
Effect of Condition: A single person having responsibility for more than one area of recording
authorization, custody of assets, and execution of transactions could result in unrecorded transactions,
misstated financial reports, clerical errors, or misappropriation of funds not being detected in a timely
manner.
Recommendation: OSAI recommends that management be aware of these conditions and realize that a
concentration of duties and responsibilities in a limited number of individuals is not desired from a control
point of view. The most effective controls lie in management’s oversight of office operations and a periodic
review of operations. OSAI recommends that management provide segregation of duties so that no one
employee is able to perform all accounting functions. In the event that segregation of duties is not possible
22
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RESPONSES
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
due to limited personnel, OSAI recommends implementing compensating controls to mitigate the risk
involved with a concentration of duties. Compensating controls would include separating key processes
and/or critical functions of the office and having management review and approval of accounting functions.
OSAI recommends the following key accounting functions of the County Treasurer’s office be adequately
segregated:
Taking in collections.
Issuing receipts.
Drawer close out and reconciliation.
Preparation of deposit.
Management Response:
County Treasurer: The Treasurer’s office strives daily to ensure that segregation of duties is being
performed and has taken steps to correct this issue. Each employee works from their own workstations
daily. All deposits and receipts are verified by two employees daily with acknowledgement signatures. A
third person, usually the Treasurer or the First Deputy then reviews the daily packet which contains all
receipts, deposit forms, and deposit tickets from the bank to make sure they reconcile.
Criteria: The GAO Standards – Principle 10 – Design Control Activities – 10.03 states in part:
Segregation of Duties
Management divides or segregates key duties and responsibilities among different people
to reduce the risk of error, misuse, or fraud. This includes separating the responsibilities
for authorizing transactions, processing and recording them, reviewing the transactions,
and handling any related assets so that no one individual controls all key aspects of a
transaction or event.
Additionally, Principle 10 - Segregation of Duties states:
10.12 – Management considers segregation of duties in designing control activity
responsibilities so that incompatible duties are segregated and, where such segregation is
not practical, designs alternative control activities to address the risk.
10.13 – Segregation of duties helps prevent fraud, waste, and abuse in the internal control
system. Management considers the need to separate control activities related to authority,
custody, and accounting of operations to achieve adequate segregation of duties. In
particular, segregation of duties can address the risk of management override. Management
override circumvents existing control activities and increases fraud risk. Management
addresses this risk through segregation of duties but cannot absolutely prevent it because
of the risk of collusion, where two or more employees act together to commit fraud.
10.14 - If segregation of duties is not practical within an operational process because of
limited personnel or other factors, management designs alternative control activities to
address the risk of fraud, waste, or abuse in the operational process.
23
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RESPONSES
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
Finding 2016-009 - Inadequate Internal Controls Over the Reconciliation of the Appropriation
Ledger to the General Ledger (Repeat Finding – 2007-002, 2008-002, 2013-004, 2014-004)
Condition: The County Clerk did not reconcile the appropriation ledger to the County Treasurer’s general
ledger.
Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure the
reconciliation of the County Clerk’s appropriation ledger to the County Treasurer’s general ledger is
performed on a monthly basis for all funds.
Effect of Condition: This condition could result in unrecorded transactions, misstated financial reports,
undetected errors, or misappropriation of funds.
Recommendation: OSAI recommends the County Clerk reconciles the appropriation ledger to the County
Treasurer’s general ledger on a monthly basis. The reconciliation should be reviewed and approved by
someone other than the preparer. All documentation to support the performance and review and approval
of the reconciliation should be retained.
Management Response:
County Clerk: We now reconcile the appropriation ledger to the general ledger on a monthly basis.
Criteria: The GAO Standards - Principle 16 – Perform Monitoring Activities: 16.05 states in part:
Internal Control System Monitoring Management performs ongoing monitoring of the
design and operating effectiveness of the internal control system as part of the normal
course of operations. Ongoing monitoring includes regular management and supervisory
activities, comparisons, reconciliations, and other routine actions.
SECTION 2—This section contains a certain matter not required to be reported in accordance with
Government Auditing Standards. However, we believe this matter is significant enough to bring to
management’s attention. We recommend that management consider this matter and take
appropriate corrective action.
Finding 2016-018 - Inadequate Internal Controls and Noncompliance Over Inmate Trust Fund
Checking Account and Sheriff Commissary Fund (Repeat Finding)
Condition: Upon inquiry and observation of the Inmate Trust Fund Checking Account and Sheriff
Commissary Fund, the following exceptions were noted:
Inmate Trust Fund Checking Account:
One employee is responsible for accessing and balancing lock box collections, reconciling
collections from the front window or mail to receipts issued, accessing safe where daily collections
24
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RESPONSES
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
are maintained, preparing and reconciling weekly deposit ticket, updating inmates’ account
balances with credits and deductions, performing monthly bank reconciliation, issuing checks from
the Inmate Trust Fund Checking Account.
On April 16, 2018, $1,705 was maintained in an unlocked cabinet within the jail instead of being
secured or on deposit in the Inmate Trust Fund Checking Account.
Collections are not deposited in the bank on a daily basis.
There are no controls in place to ensure access to the safe, where collections are held, is restricted.
The County has no idea who has the combination to the safe.
Bank reconciliations are not signed by the preparer and have no indication of being reviewed and
approved by someone other than the preparer.
Individual inmate balances are not reconciled back to the Inmate Trust Ledger balance used in the
Inmate Trust Fund Checking Account bank reconciliation; there was an unknown variance of
$2,155.
The June 30, 2016 bank reconciliation included:
o Unexplained adjustments of $996.
o Outstanding checks from as far back as 2010.
Policies and procedures have not been designed to track unclaimed funds.
Inmates are allowed to make purchases in excess of funds the individual inmate has available
resulting in a negative ledger balance.
Other employees are able to log into the commissary system using the Records and Commissary
Administrator’s credentials; thereby, overriding any access restrictions.
Sheriff Commissary Fund:
The County Sheriff’s office does not file an annual report for the Sheriff Commissary Fund with
the Board of County Commissioners by January 15th of each year.
Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented for proper
administration regarding the Inmate Trust Fund Checking Account and the Sheriff Commissary Fund.
Effect of Condition: These conditions resulted in noncompliance with state statutes. Without proper
accounting and safeguarding of the Inmate Trust Fund Checking Account, there is an increased risk of
undetected errors and possible misappropriation of funds.
Recommendation: OSAI recommends management be aware of these conditions and determine if duties
can be properly segregated. In the event that segregation of duties is not possible due to limited personnel,
OSAI recommends implementing compensating controls to mitigate the risks involved with a concentration
of duties. Compensating controls would include separating key processes and/or critical functions of the
office and having management review and approval of accounting functions.
OSAI further recommends the County Sheriff implement procedures to ensure:
All money coming in with an inmate at booking is deposited into the Inmate Trust Fund Checking
Account in accordance with Title 19 O.S.§ 531.
Daily collections are deposited into the Inmate Trust Fund Checking Account on a daily basis.
25
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RESPONSES
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
All collections are maintained in a secure location with limited access.
Bank reconciliations are performed on a monthly basis, indicate proof of review and approval by
someone other than the preparer, and any variances are explained.
Individual inmate balances are reconciled to the Inmate Trust Fund Ledger balance and any
variances are explained.
Unclaimed funds are tracked.
Inmates cannot spend more than they have available.
Individual system access credentials are not shared.
The County Sheriff files a report of the commissary with the Board of County Commissioners by
January 15th, of each year in accordance with 19 O.S. § 180.43 (D).
Management Response:
County Sheriff: I did not take office until January of 2021. We use a different Inmate Trust Commissary
vendor now for the inmate trust fund and commissary accounts. We now have one employee that takes the
money out of both lockboxes and works with another employee to match the funds with the receipts from
the lockboxes and reconcile with the vendor reports. When an inmate is booked in, their money is placed
into a lockbox provided by commissary vendor and their system keeps track of the amounts. Deposits are
now made on a daily basis unless it is after banking hours in which case the funds are locked in a safe
located in the office manager’s office. This office is locked after hours and the safe combination is known
by office employees only
We no longer accept money from the front window or through the mail. When inmates are released, they
are issued a debit card and not a check. The only time a check is written is when an inmate is transferred to
prison due to the prison not accepting debit cards. Additionally, we no longer allow inmates to run their
commissary balances in the negative and have restricted access to the commissary and inmate trust fund
checking account to office personnel. The only action the jailers can make in the Inmate Trust Fund system
is to add money to the individual inmate’s account in the system.
Bank reconciliations are now being signed by the preparer and then reviewed and approved by the office
manager. The variances, adjustments, and outstanding checks noted with in the bank reconciliations were
all noted well before I took office.
Although we will not be going back to prepare old reports, we have received the support documentation to
prepare the report that will be presented to the BOCC on an annual basis.
Criteria: Component objectives of effective internal control systems are to deter and detect fraud and to
provide accurate and reliable information. Internal controls are designed to safeguard assets and to analyze
and check accuracy, completeness, and authorization of transactions. Failure to perform tasks that are part
of internal controls, such as segregating duties or implementing compensating reviews, performing bank
reconciliations accurately and timely, and maintaining records in a manner to ensure compliance with state
statutes and/or to minimize the risk of misappropriation, are deficiencies in internal control.
26
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RESPONSES
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
The GAO Standards – Principal 10 – Design Control Activities – 10.03 states in part:
Establishment of review of performance measurers and indicators
Management establishes physical control to secure and safeguard vulnerable assets.
Examples include security for and limited access to assets such as cash, securities,
inventories, and equipment that might be vulnerable to risk of loss or unauthorized use.
Management periodically counts and compares such assets to control records.
Segregation of duties
Management divides or segregates key duties and responsibilities among different people
to reduce the risk of error, misuse, or fraud. This includes separating the responsibilities
for authorizing transactions, processing and recording them, reviewing the transactions,
and handling any related assets so that no one individual controls all key aspects of a
transaction or event.
Accurate and timely recording of transactions
Transactions are promptly recorded to maintain their relevance and value to management
in controlling operations and making decisions. This applies to the entire process or life
cycle of a transaction or event from its initiation and authorization through its final
classification in summary records. In addition, management designs control activities so
that all transactions are completely and accurately recorded.”
Additionally, GAO Standards – Section 2 – Establishing an Effective Internal Control System – OV2.23
states in part:
Objectives of an Entity – Compliance Objectives
Management conducts activities in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. As
part of specifying compliance objectives, the entity determines which laws and regulations
apply to the entity. Management is expected to set objectives that incorporate these
requirements.
Furthermore, GAO Standards – Section 2 – Establishing an Effective Internal Control System – OV2.24
states in part:
Safeguarding of Assets
Management designs an internal control system to provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or prompt detection and correction of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of an entity’s assets.
Title 19 O.S. § 531 states, “The county sheriff shall deposit all monies collected from inmates
incarcerated in the county jail into the Inmate Trust Account, and further states that checks
can only be written to Sheriff’s Commissary Account for purchases and to the inmate from
unencumbered balances upon discharge.”
27
OTTAWA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RESPONSES
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
Title 19 O.S. § 180.43D requires that an annual report of the Sheriff’s Commissary be submitted to the
Board of County Commissioners by January 15 of each year.
28